SynthesisPaediatric drugs2020
The Role of Probiotics in the Prevention and Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis in Children: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Synthesis in Paediatric drugs, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of probiotics in preventing atopic dermatitis in infants: A systematic review and meta-analysis.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Pooled it
- The impact of prebiotics, probiotics and synbiotics on the prevention and treatment of atopic dermatitis in children: an umbrella meta-analysis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Pooled it
- Probiotics supplements for the prevention of atopic dermatitis in children: an umbrella review.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Pooled it
- Postnatal probiotic supplementation can prevent and optimize treatment of childhood asthma and atopic disorders: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Pooled it
- The Effectiveness of ProbioticNutrients · 2021Trial
- Probiotics for pediatric atopic dermatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2026Article
- Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BLa80 for preventing allergic, respiratory, and gastrointestinal diseases in young children in China: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial.Clinical and experimental pediatrics · 2026Article
- Programming the Infant Gut: How Maternal and Early Life Nutrition Shape the Infant Microbiome and Long-term Health-A Narrative Review.Molecular nutrition & food research · 2026Review
- The gut‑skin axis: Emerging insights in understanding and treating skin diseases through gut microbiome modulation (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2025Review
- Microbiota Modulation as an Approach to Prevent the Use of Antimicrobials Associated with Canine Atopic Dermatitis.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Probiotics and human health: biological activities, nutritional aspects, immunomodulatory properties, applications, and future perspectives - a comprehensive review.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Progress in Probiotic Science: Prospects of Functional Probiotic-Based Foods and Beverages.International journal of food science · 2025Review
- A non-inferiority clinical trial comparing probiotics and oral corticosteroids for the management of acute exacerbation of atopic dermatitis patients.Skin health and disease · 2024Article
- Skin Deep: The Potential of Microbiome Cosmetics.Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea) · 2024Review
- A novel infant microbiome formula (SIM03) improved eczema severity and quality of life in preschool children.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The Potential Impact of Probiotics on Human Health: An Update on Their Health-Promoting Properties.Microorganisms · 2024Review
- Research Progress on the Correlation of Atopic Dermatitis with Gut Microbiota.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2024Review
- Effect of Mixed Probiotics on Ovalbumin-Induced Atopic Dermatitis in Juvenile Mice.International journal of microbiology · 2024Article
- The efficacy and safety of oral microecological agents as add-on therapy for atopic dermatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.Clinical and translational allergy · 2023Review
- Improvements in Gut Microbiome Composition Predict the Clinical Efficacy of a Novel Synbiotics Formula in Children with Mild to Moderate Atopic Dermatitis.Microorganisms · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAtopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease common among infants and children. It is associated with a high risk of allergies, asthma, and mental health problems. Attempts have been made to use probiotics in clinical interventions for AD.
objectiveOur objective was to perform an updated meta-analysis of recently published studies to evaluate the effect of probiotics in the prevention and treatment of AD in children and to further understand the role of probiotics in AD interventions in the clinic.
methodWe searched the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang databases with prespecified selection criteria from inception of each database to 11 January 2020. No language restrictions were applied.
resultsA total of 25 studies were included in our meta-analysis. Of these, 14 were prevention studies (with 3049 children enrolled) and 11 were treatment studies (with 816 children enrolled). One treatment study was excluded after the sensitivity analysis. From the 14 prevention studies included, the pooled relative risk ratio of AD in those treated with probiotics versus placebo was 0.70 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57-0.84; P = 0.0002]. Subgroup analyses showed that only mixed strains of probiotics had a significant effect on lowering the incidence of AD. Probiotics administered solely to infants did not prevent the development of AD, but effects were significant when probiotics were administered to both pregnant mothers and their infants or solely to pregnant mothers. In studies with treatment durations > 6 months, the incidence of AD decreased significantly; a similar effect was achieved when the treatment duration was < 6 months. Meta-analysis of the ten treatment studies showed a significant decrease in the weighted mean difference (WMD) in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) index values in the probiotics group compared with the control group (WMD, - 7.23; 95% CI - 10.59 to - 3.88; P < 0.0001). Subgroup analyses showed that both single-strain and mixed-strain probiotics had a significant effect on improving SCORAD values. Studies with participants aged < 1 year (P = 0.07) reported no significant results. In studies with treatment periods > 8 weeks, SCORAD values seemed to decrease more than in studies with treatment periods < 8 weeks. However, the subgroup difference was only statistically significant when the analysis was performed according to participant age in prevention studies.
conclusionOur updated meta-analysis demonstrates that interventions with probiotics potentially lower the incidence of AD and relieve AD symptoms in children, particularly when treating infants and children aged ≥ 1 year with AD. Interventions with mixed-strain probiotics tended to have better preventive and curative effects. Probiotics administered solely to infants appeared to produce negative preventive effects. Different intervention durations might also affect clinical outcomes. However, given the insignificant subgroup differences, except for treatment by participant age, and the moderate heterogeneity among the studies, these conclusions should be interpreted with caution, and more powerful randomized controlled trials using standardized measurements should be conducted to assess the long-term effects of probiotics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.