Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32748339›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2021

Development of a Risk Score and Nomogram to Predict Individual Benefit Attained from the Addition of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Stage II Colon Cancer.

Daniel W Nelson, Clay Merritt, Shu-Ching Chang, Gary Grunkemeier, Scott R Steele, Melanie Goldfarb

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel W NelsonDepartment of Surgery, William Beaumont Army Medical Center, 5005 N. Piedras St., El Paso, TX, 79920, USA. usarmydoc@mac.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1555-819X
Clay MerrittDepartment of Surgery, William Beaumont Army Medical Center, 5005 N. Piedras St., El Paso, TX, 79920, USA.
Shu-Ching ChangMedical Data Research Center, Providence St. Joseph Health, Portland, OR, USA.
Gary GrunkemeierMedical Data Research Center, Providence St. Joseph Health, Portland, OR, USA.
Scott R SteeleDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Melanie GoldfarbDivision of Surgical Oncology, John Wayne Cancer Institute at Providence Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
Providence College · USWilliam Beaumont Army Medical Center · USCleveland Clinic · USSaint John's Health Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent guidelines recommend considering adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) for stage II colon cancer (CC) with poor prognostic clinicopathologic and molecular features. However, the relative impact of individual or constellations of high-risk features remains undefined. We developed an individualized point-of-care tool to predict survival benefit attained from the addition of AC.

methodsThe National Cancer Database was queried for all patients with resected stage II CC from 2004 to 2015. A prognostic risk score and nomogram were constructed using twelve clinicopathologic and molecular prognostic factors associated with outcomes for CC. Overall survival (OS) was compared between surgery alone and AC groups. The nomogram was validated for discrimination and calibration using bootstrap-adjusted Harrell's concordance index (C-index). For population-level estimation, OS was compared based on quartiles.

resultsOf 132,666 patients with stage II CC, 16.8% received AC. The calibration curve of the constructed nomogram showed a good agreement between predicted and observed median and 3-, 5-, and 10-year survival (bootstrap-adjusted C-index 0.699, CI: 0.698-0.703). Population-level risk score analysis (median [Q1, Q3]; 4.9 [4.6, 5.5]) demonstrated that patients with scores > 3.34 had significantly decreased risk of death with the addition of AC (all p < 0.001). No survival advantage was associated with AC among patients with low risk scores (risk score < 3.34: HR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.80-1.11, p = 0.47). DISCUSSION: A composite weighted risk score is critical to individualizing AC in select high-risk patients. Our nomogram provides individualized prognostication and estimation of benefit attained from AC. This may better inform treatment decisions and aid future trial design.

Indexed as

Colonic NeoplasmsNomogramsChemotherapy, AdjuvantHumansNeoplasm StagingRisk FactorsAdjuvant chemotherapyColon cancerHigh riskStage II

Identifiers

PMID32748339
OpenAlexW3046940367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.