Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32748270›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2021

Laparoscopic hepatectomy enhances recovery for small hepatocellular carcinoma with liver cirrhosis by postoperative inflammatory response attenuation: a propensity score matching analysis with a conventional open approach.

Xiu-Tao Fu, Zheng Tang, Jia-Feng Chen, Ying-Hong Shi, Wei-Ren Liu, Qiang Gao, Guang-Yu Ding, Kang Song, Xiao-Ying Wang, Jian Zhou and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Efficacy of Laparoscopic HepatectomyFrontiers in oncology · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Xiu-Tao Fu *Department of Liver Surgery & Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 1609 Xietu Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Zheng Tang *Department of Liver Surgery & Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 1609 Xietu Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Jia-Feng Chen *Department of Liver Surgery & Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 1609 Xietu Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Ying-Hong ShiDepartment of Liver Surgery & Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 1609 Xietu Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Wei-Ren LiuDepartment of Liver Surgery & Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 1609 Xietu Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Qiang GaoDepartment of Liver Surgery & Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 1609 Xietu Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Guang-Yu DingDepartment of Liver Surgery & Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 1609 Xietu Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Kang SongDepartment of Liver Surgery & Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 1609 Xietu Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Xiao-Ying WangDepartment of Liver Surgery & Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 1609 Xietu Road, Shanghai, 200032, China. wang.xiaoying1@zs-hospital.sh.cn.
Jian ZhouDepartment of Liver Surgery & Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 1609 Xietu Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Jia FanDepartment of Liver Surgery & Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 1609 Xietu Road, Shanghai, 200032, China. fan.jia@zs-hospital.sh.cn.
Zhen-Bin DingDepartment of Liver Surgery & Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 1609 Xietu Road, Shanghai, 200032, China. ding.zhenbin@zs-hospital.sh.cn.ORCID 0000-0001-6613-8270
Fudan University · CNMinistry of Education of the People's Republic of China · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe concurrent presence of liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) poses a challenge for laparoscopic surgeons to establish a routine practice. The aim of this study was to gather evidence and produce recommendations on the safe and effective practice of laparoscopic hepatectomy for patients with solitary HCC (≤ 5 cm) and liver cirrhosis.

methodsBetween October 2013 and October 2014, 356 curative hepatectomies were performed for patients pathologically diagnosed with solitary HCC (≤ 5 cm) accompanied by cirrhosis (stage 4 fibrosis). To overcome selection bias, a 1:2 match using propensity score matching analysis was conducted between laparoscopic and open hepatectomy. Perioperative outcomes were compared between the groups, including hospitalization, operation time, blood loss, and surgical complications. Perioperative inflammation-based markers, including systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) were collected from medical records and analyzed.

resultsThere were 43 and 77 patients in the laparoscopic and open groups, respectively. The laparoscopic group had less hepatic inflow occlusion (16.3% vs. 61%; P < 0.001), shorter operation time (155 vs. 170 min; P = 0.004), and shorter postoperative hospital stay (4 vs. 7 days; P < 0.001). Although the difference was not significant (P = 0.154), the rate of postoperative complications tended to be lower in the laparoscopic group (2.3%) compared with the open group (9.1%). The increase in postoperative SII, NLR, and LMR for laparoscopic hepatectomy were significantly lower than for open hepatectomy. NLR < 5.8 on postoperative day 3 was significantly correlated with shorter hospital stay (P < 0.001).

conclusionsCompared with open hepatectomy, laparoscopic hepatectomy for selected HCC patients, even in the presence of cirrhosis, might result in better perioperative outcomes and postoperative inflammatory response attenuation, and ultimately promote faster recovery. This provides evidence for considering routine laparoscopic hepatectomy through careful selection of patients with HCC.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCarcinoma, HepatocellularFemaleHepatectomyHumansLaparoscopyLiver CirrhosisLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPropensity ScoreRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeHepatectomyHepatocellular carcinomaInflammatory responseLaparoscopyLiver cirrhosis

Identifiers

PMID32748270
OpenAlexW3047176412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.