ArticleSurgical endoscopy2021
Sustaining a laparoscopic program in resource-limited environments: results and lessons learned over 13 years in Botswana.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Training programme in gasless laparoscopy for rural surgeons of India (TARGET study) - Observational feasibility study.International journal of surgery open · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMetrics of sustainability and frank descriptions of the unique challenges, successes, failures, and lessons learned from a longitudinal laparoscopic program in resource-limited environments are lacking. We set out to evaluate the safety and sustainability of the laparoscopic cholecystectomy program at Princess Marina Hospital, the largest tertiary and teaching hospital in Botswana.
methodsWe assessed the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy, comparing them with patients who underwent open cholecystectomy from January 2013 to December 2018. Technical independence and sustainability factors were measured and discussed.
resultsTwo hundred and twenty-six laparoscopic cholecystectomies (LC) and 39 open cholecystectomies (OC) were performed. Four surgeons who trained as part of the inaugural laparoscopic program performed 48.2% of LC. Eleven surgeons who trained elsewhere performed the remainder. Overall, 94.2% of LC were performed without expatriate surgeons. The conversion rate was 25/226 (11.1%). There were 3 bile duct injuries in the LC group (3/226, 1.3%) and none in the OC group. There was one mortality in the OC group (1/39, 2.6%) and none in the LC group. Fostering a trusting relationship among all stakeholder was identified as the major key to success, while the development of a system-based strategy was identified as the most significant ongoing challenge.
conclusionThe laparoscopic cholecystectomy program in Botswana initially established between 2006 and 2012 has moved into its sustainability phase, characterized by increased usage of laparoscopy and greater independent operating by local surgeons, all while maintaining patient safety. Sustaining a laparoscopic program in resource-limited environments has particular challenges which may differ from country to country.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.