Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32748204›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2020

Validation of the GOAL Questionnaire as an Obstructive Sleep Apnea Screening Instrument in Bariatric Surgery Candidates: a Brazilian Single-Center Study.

Ricardo L M Duarte, Flavio J Magalhães-da-Silveira, David Gozal

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Brazilian Thoracic Association Consensus on Sleep-disordered Breathing.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ricardo L M DuarteSleepLab - Laboratório de Estudo dos Distúrbios do Sono, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. rlmduarte@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2611-4001
Flavio J Magalhães-da-SilveiraSleepLab - Laboratório de Estudo dos Distúrbios do Sono, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4518-4459
David GozalDepartment of Child Health and the Child Health Research Institute, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, MO, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8195-6036

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo validate the GOAL questionnaire as obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) screening tool in bariatric surgery (BS) patients and compare it with other existing instruments.

methodsBefore performing full polysomnography (PSG), all participants were screened for OSA with the following instruments: GOAL, STOP, STOP-Bang, No-Apnea, NoSAS, and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). Discrimination was assessed by area under the curve (AUC), while predictive parameters were calculated by contingency tables. Correlation was evaluated by the Spearman correlation coefficient (r). OSA severity was classified based on the apnea/hypopnea index (AHI): ≥ 5.0/h (OSA

resultsOverall, 814 BS individuals (70.8% of females) were enrolled. We found a high prevalence of OSA

conclusionsIn a cohort of BS patients, GOAL, No-Apnea, STOP-Bang, and NoSAS, but not ESS and STOP, enable satisfactory discrimination as OSA screening instruments at all disease severity levels.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryObesity, MorbidSleep Apnea, ObstructiveBrazilFemaleGoalsHumansMaleMass ScreeningSurveys and QuestionnairesBariatric surgeryDiagnosisObesityObstructive sleep apneaPolysomnographyScreening

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.