Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32748196›Full record

ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2020

Clinical significance of phenotyping and karyotyping of detecting circulating tumor cells in renal cell carcinoma using subtraction enrichment and immunostaining-fluorescence in situ hybridization (SE-iFISH).

Dongxu Tian, Mingxin Zhang, Guoyang Zheng, Yushi Zhang, Yongqiang Li, Ping Lin, Hanzhong Li, Wei Jiao, Haitao Niu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urology and nephrology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 53% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Dongxu TianDepartment of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1039-2787
Mingxin ZhangDepartment of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Guoyang ZhengDepartment of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yushi ZhangDepartment of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yongqiang LiDepartment of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Ping LinCytelligen, San Diego, CA, USA.
Hanzhong LiDepartment of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China. lihanzhongzmx@163.com.
Wei JiaoDepartment of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China. jiaowei1213@126.com.
Haitao NiuDepartment of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China. niuht0532@126.com.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNQingdao University · CNCytel (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesCirculating tumor cells (CTCs) as a noninvasive detection technology have become a research hotspot in the field of precision medicine. However, CTC detection faces great challenges with respect to specificity and sensitivity.

methodsWe divided 39 subjects into three groups: renal carcinoma, renal stones and healthy persons. Using subtraction enrichment (SE) combined with immunostaining-fluorescence in situ hybridization technology, we identified and characterized CTCs. CTCs were identified as DAPI +/CD45-/PanCK + (-). We explored whether the number of CTCs was related to clinicopathological factors and their clinical application.

resultsThe CTC count in the renal carcinoma group (29/39) was 86.20% using a cut-off value of 1 CTC, which was significantly higher than that of other technologies in detecting CTCs, demonstrating that SE-iFISH technology can be used for CTC detection. The CTC count was much higher in the renal carcinoma group than that in the other control groups, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.931 (95% confidence interval 0.851 to 1.000, P < 0.01). In addition, the tetraploid count on chromosome 8 of T4 stage renal carcinoma was much higher than that of other stages (T1-T3), which may suggest that tetraploid count could be a marker of renal carcinoma prognosis and influence treatment decisions for better clinical management.

conclusionsOur study showed that SE-iFISH technology can be used to detect CTCs in renal carcinoma with high sensitivity and specificity. Therefore, the analysis of CTCs with SE-iFISH has clear potential to improve the management of patients with renal carcinoma.

Indexed as

Neoplastic Cells, CirculatingCarcinoma, Renal CellFemaleHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceKaryotypingKidney NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPhenotypeSensitivity and SpecificityCirculating tumor cells (CTCs)Renal cancerSubtraction enrichment combined with immunostaining-fluorescence in situ hybridization (SE-iFISH)

Identifiers

PMID32748196
OpenAlexW3046978201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.