Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32748176›Full record

ArticleActa diabetologica2020

Diabetic retinopathy screening in urban primary care setting with a handheld smartphone-based retinal camera.

Márcia Silva Queiroz, Jacira Xavier de Carvalho, Silvia Ferreira Bortoto, Mozania Reis de Matos, Cristiane das Graças Dias Cavalcante, Elenilda Almeida Silva Andrade, Maria Lúcia Correa-Giannella, Fernando Korn Malerbi

Erratum issuedAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Acta diabetologica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Ophthalmic imaging in diabetic retinopathy: A review.Clinical & experimental ophthalmology · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Márcia Silva QueirozPrograma de Pos-Graduaçao em Medicina, Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE), Rua Vergueiro 235, 2° subsolo, Pos-graduação, Sao Paulo, 01504-001, Brazil.
Jacira Xavier de CarvalhoUnidade Basica de Saude Dra. Ilza Weltman Hutzler, Rua Coronel Walfrido de Carvalho, Sao Paulo, 02472-180, Brazil.
Silvia Ferreira BortotoPrograma de Pos-Graduaçao em Medicina, Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE), Rua Vergueiro 235, 2° subsolo, Pos-graduação, Sao Paulo, 01504-001, Brazil.
Mozania Reis de MatosUnidade Basica de Saude Dra. Ilza Weltman Hutzler, Rua Coronel Walfrido de Carvalho, Sao Paulo, 02472-180, Brazil.
Cristiane das Graças Dias CavalcanteUnidade Basica de Saude Dra. Ilza Weltman Hutzler, Rua Coronel Walfrido de Carvalho, Sao Paulo, 02472-180, Brazil.
Elenilda Almeida Silva AndradeUnidade Basica de Saude Dra. Ilza Weltman Hutzler, Rua Coronel Walfrido de Carvalho, Sao Paulo, 02472-180, Brazil.
Maria Lúcia Correa-GiannellaPrograma de Pos-Graduaçao em Medicina, Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE), Rua Vergueiro 235, 2° subsolo, Pos-graduação, Sao Paulo, 01504-001, Brazil.
Fernando Korn MalerbiPrograma de Graduaçao em Medicina, Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE), Rua Vergueiro 235, Sao Paulo, 01504-001, Brazil. fernandokmalerbi@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6523-5172

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo evaluate diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening with a portable handheld smartphone-based retinal camera and telemedicine in an urban primary healthcare setting and to evaluate the learning curve for image acquisition, performed by healthcare personnel without previous experience in retinal imaging.

methodsThis was a prospective study that enrolled patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) followed at a primary healthcare unit in São Paulo, Brazil. After a brief training in image acquisition, there was further continuous feedback given by a retina specialist during the remote image reading process. Each patient underwent two fundus and one anterior ocular segment images per eye, after mydriasis. Patients were classified according to the need of referral.

resultsA total of 627 adult individuals with T2DM underwent retinal evaluation. The population was composed by 63.2% female individuals, age median of 66 years, diabetes duration 10.7 ± 8.2 years and HbA1c 7.7 ± 1.9% (61 + 20.8 mmol/mol). The most prevalent associated comorbidities were arterial hypertension (80.3%) and dyslipidemia (50.2%). Referral decision was possible in 81.2% patients. Most patients had absent or non-referable DR; the main ocular media opacity detected was cataract. After the 7th day of image acquisition, the daily rate of patients whose images allowed clinical decision was maintained above 80%. A higher HbA1c was associated with referable DR.

conclusionsA low-cost DR screening strategy with a handheld device and telemedicine is feasible and has the potential to increase coverage of DR screening in underserved areas; the possibility of mobile units is relevant for DR screening in the context of COVID-19 pandemic. Daily rate of patients whose examinations allowed clinical decision. X-axis: day of examination; Y-axis: rate (%) of patients whose examinations allowed a clinical decision.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBrazilCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic RetinopathyFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPandemicsPhotographyPneumonia, ViralPrevalenceBlindnessCOVID-19Diabetic retinopathyPrimary careScreeningTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID32748176
PMCPMC7398859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.