Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32748088›Full record

ArticleBasic research in cardiology2020

Metoprolol blunts the time-dependent progression of infarct size.

Manuel Lobo-Gonzalez, Carlos Galán-Arriola, Xavier Rossello, Maribel González-Del-Hoyo, Jean Paul Vilchez, María I Higuero-Verdejo, Jose M García-Ruiz, Gonzalo J López-Martín, Javier Sánchez-González, Eduardo Oliver and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Basic research in cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Targeting GαBasic research in cardiology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. A tale of pigs, beta-blockers and genetic variants.Basic research in cardiology · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Manuel Lobo-GonzalezTranslational Laboratory for Cardiovascular Imaging and Therapy, Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares (CNIC), Madrid, Spain.
Carlos Galán-ArriolaTranslational Laboratory for Cardiovascular Imaging and Therapy, Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares (CNIC), Madrid, Spain.
Xavier RosselloTranslational Laboratory for Cardiovascular Imaging and Therapy, Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares (CNIC), Madrid, Spain.
Maribel González-Del-HoyoTranslational Laboratory for Cardiovascular Imaging and Therapy, Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares (CNIC), Madrid, Spain.
Jean Paul VilchezTranslational Laboratory for Cardiovascular Imaging and Therapy, Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares (CNIC), Madrid, Spain.
María I Higuero-VerdejoTranslational Laboratory for Cardiovascular Imaging and Therapy, Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares (CNIC), Madrid, Spain.
Jose M García-RuizTranslational Laboratory for Cardiovascular Imaging and Therapy, Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares (CNIC), Madrid, Spain.
Gonzalo J López-MartínTranslational Laboratory for Cardiovascular Imaging and Therapy, Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares (CNIC), Madrid, Spain.
Javier Sánchez-GonzálezTranslational Laboratory for Cardiovascular Imaging and Therapy, Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares (CNIC), Madrid, Spain.
Eduardo OliverTranslational Laboratory for Cardiovascular Imaging and Therapy, Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares (CNIC), Madrid, Spain.
Gonzalo PizarroTranslational Laboratory for Cardiovascular Imaging and Therapy, Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares (CNIC), Madrid, Spain.
Valentin FusterTranslational Laboratory for Cardiovascular Imaging and Therapy, Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares (CNIC), Madrid, Spain.
Borja IbanezTranslational Laboratory for Cardiovascular Imaging and Therapy, Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares (CNIC), Madrid, Spain. bibanez@cnic.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5036-254X
Spanish National Centre for Cardiovascular Research · ESCentro de Investigación en Red en Enfermedades Cardiovasculares · ES

Funding

European Research Council 819775Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI16/02110
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early metoprolol administration protects against myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury, but its effect on infarct size progression (ischemic injury) is unknown. Eight groups of pigs (total n = 122) underwent coronary artery occlusion of varying duration (20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, or 60 min) followed by reperfusion. In each group, pigs were randomized to i.v. metoprolol (0.75 mg/kg) or vehicle (saline) 20 min after ischemia onset. The primary outcome measure was infarct size (IS) on day7 cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) normalized to area at risk (AAR, measured by perfusion computed tomography [CT] during ischemia). Metoprolol treatment reduced overall mortality (10% vs 26%, p = 0.03) and the incidence and number of primary ventricular fibrillations during infarct induction. In controls, IS after 20-min ischemia was ≈ 5% of the area AAR. Thereafter, IS progressed exponentially, occupying almost all the AAR after 35 min of ischemia. Metoprolol injection significantly reduced the slope of IS progression (p = 0.004 for final IS). Head-to-head comparison (metoprolol treated vs vehicle treated) showed statistically significant reductions in IS at 30, 35, 40, and 50-min reperfusion. At 60-min reperfusion, IS was 100% of AAR in both groups. Despite more prolonged ischemia, metoprolol-treated pigs reperfused at 50 min had smaller infarcts than control pigs undergoing ischemia for 40 or 45 min and similar-sized infarcts to those undergoing 35-min ischemia. Day-45 LVEF was higher in metoprolol-treated vs vehicle-treated pigs (41.6% vs 36.5%, p = 0.008). In summary, metoprolol administration early during ischemia attenuates IS progression and reduces the incidence of primary ventricular fibrillation. These data identify metoprolol as an intervention ideally suited to the treatment of STEMI patients identified early in the course of infarction and requiring long transport times before primary angioplasty.

Indexed as

Administration, IntravenousAdrenergic beta-1 Receptor AntagonistsAnimalsCardiac Imaging TechniquesDisease ProgressionDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMetoprololMyocardial Reperfusion InjuryMyocardiumST Elevation Myocardial InfarctionSwineTime FactorsAdrenergic beta-1 Receptor AntagonistsMetoprololAcute myocardial infarctionEarly reperfusionIschemia–reperfusion injuryMetoprolol

Identifiers

PMID32748088
PMCPMC7398954
OpenAlexW3047297176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.