Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32748044›Full record

ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2021

Three-dimensional (3D) visualization provides better outcome than two-dimensional (2D) visualization in single-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: a propensity-matched analysis.

So Hyun Kang, Yongjoon Won, Kanghaeng Lee, Sang Il Youn, Sa-Hong Min, Young Suk Park, Sang-Hoon Ahn, Hyung-Ho Kim

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. 3D laparoscopic-assistedWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

So Hyun KangDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 300 Gumi-dong, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, 13620, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8248-9043
Yongjoon WonDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 300 Gumi-dong, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, 13620, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9222-288X
Kanghaeng LeeDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 300 Gumi-dong, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, 13620, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0241-2781
Sang Il YounDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 300 Gumi-dong, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, 13620, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4029-8572
Sa-Hong MinDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 300 Gumi-dong, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, 13620, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6150-7935
Young Suk ParkDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 300 Gumi-dong, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, 13620, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6352-9759
Sang-Hoon AhnDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 300 Gumi-dong, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, 13620, South Korea. viscaria@snubh.org.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8827-3625
Hyung-Ho KimDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 300 Gumi-dong, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, 13620, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8916-0048
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital · KRNew Generation University College · ETSeoul National University · KR

Funding

Seoul National University Hospital 14-2014-036
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThere are currently no reports on the application of three-dimensional (3D) vision to single-incision laparoscopic surgery. This study compared 3D vision to the previous two-dimensional (2D) system in single-incision laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (SIDG).

methodsMedical charts of 179 gastric cancer patients who underwent SIDG from February 2014 to December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were grouped into either a 2D group or 3D group depending on the type of camera that was used. All operations were performed using a flexible camera (Olympus, Japan). Operative data and postoperative outcome were analyzed.

resultsThere were 90 patients in the 2D group and 89 patients in the 3D group. No differences were found in terms of the age, body mass index, staging, and other demographics of the patients. Operative time was significantly faster in the 3D group (115.6 ± 34.0 vs. 129.4 ± 38.5 min, p = 0.012), and estimated blood loss (EBL) was less in the 3D group (20.7 ± 30.0 vs. 35.1 ± 56.0 ml, p = 0.034). Patients in the 3D group were able to start a small fluid diet earlier (2.5, range 1-6 vs. 3.0, range 2-8 postoperative days, p = 0.006) and were discharged faster (5.4, range 3-12 vs. 6.2, range 4-24 postoperative days, p = 0.024). There was no statistical difference between early and late complications.

conclusionThe use of the 3D camera shortened operative time with possible clinical benefits for patients undergoing SIDG.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyStomach NeoplasmsGastrectomyHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalOperative TimeRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeLaparoscopyMinimally invasive surgical proceduresStomach neoplasmThree-dimensional

Identifiers

PMID32748044
OpenAlexW3047550880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.