Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32748027›Full record

ArticleInternational orthopaedics2020

Flexor tendon repair with amniotic membrane.

Saket Prakash, Pulkit Kalra, Anil Dhal

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International orthopaedics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Saket PrakashDepartment of Orthopaedics, Maulana Azad Medical College & Lok Nayak Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Pulkit KalraDepartment of Orthopaedics, Maulana Azad Medical College & Lok Nayak Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Anil DhalDepartment of Orthopaedics, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India. anildhal@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-0939-5283
Maulana Azad Medical College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFlexor tendon adhesion to tissues is one of the most frequent complications reported after flexor tendon repair. The human amniotic membrane (HAM) was used to wrap the tendon repair site to decrease fibrotic response and tendon adhesion.

methodsA total of 19 patients with flexor tendon injuries were subjected to surgical repair. The repair site was wrapped with human amniotic membrane (HAM) in nine cases. The remaining ten cases served as controls as no HAM wrap was used. The clinical outcome was assessed by pain, range of motion, and pinch strength. The healing of repair was evaluated with high-frequency ultrasound; the biologic response was assessed with two inflammatory mediators, i.e., interleukin-6 and TGF-beta-1.

resultsHAM wrap cases recorded less pain, higher total active range of motion, and better tendon glide on ultrasonography at follow-up (6-18 months). The levels of serum inflammatory biologic markers decreased in majority of HAM cases whereas they increased in controls at two to six weeks post-operatively. No infection/immune rejection phenomenon was seen in HAM wrap cases.

conclusionsHAM wrap around the tendon repair site resulted in quicker function and qualitatively better tendon healing on ultrasound, with a decrease of the biologic response.

Indexed as

AmnionTendon InjuriesHumansRange of Motion, ArticularTendonsTissue AdhesionsFlexor tendonHigh-frequency ultrasoundHuman amniotic membraneInterleukin-6TGF-beta-1

Identifiers

PMID32748027
OpenAlexW3047494043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.