Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32748017›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of pediatrics2021

Management of pain in newborn circumcision: a systematic review.

Serena Rossi, Giuseppe Buonocore, Carlo Valerio Bellieni

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05233683 (Caudal Block Versus Dorsal Penile Nerve Block Plus Ring Block for Pain Management of Different Surgical Techniques of Circumcision in Infants and Children), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05233683 phase3unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Caudal Block Versus Dorsal Penile Nerve Block Plus Ring Block for Pain Management of Different Surgical Techniques of Circumcision in Infants and Children

TypeinterventionalSponsorKing Saud UniversityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled120ConditionsAnesthesia, Anesthesia, Local, Analgesia, Pediatric ALLArmsCaudal block, Dorsal penile nerve block plus ring block, Circumcision with Plastibell, Conventional Dissection Method
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Evidence-based guideline for neonatal pain management in China (2023)].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2023
    Guideline
  2. Local anesthetic techniques for analgesia in neonatal circumcision: a network meta-analysis.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Improving pain score and restraint duration during circumcision.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Serena RossiDepartment of Molecular and Developmental Medicine, University of Siena, Siena, Italy. serestar90@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8966-4967
Giuseppe BuonocoreDepartment of Molecular and Developmental Medicine, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Carlo Valerio BellieniDepartment of Molecular and Developmental Medicine, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
University of Siena · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Male circumcision (MC) is one of the most common surgical procedures performed on neonates. In the last decades, there have been consistent advances in the understanding of pain mechanisms in newborns, and analgesia has become a fundamental part of neonatal care. MC is still often performed with inappropriate analgesic methods, and there is still great variability among the various centers about surgical and anesthethic techniques to do it. The purpose of this review is to summarize the findings in the literature about pain management and analgesia during newborn MC. We performed a systematic review of neonatal MC studies published in the last 20 years. The most effective technique appeared to be the combination of pharmacological and non-pharmacological methods of analgesia.Conclusion: Combining local anesthesia with non-pharmacological analgesic strategies appears to be effective preventing procedural pain during MC. However, a standardized protocol for analgesia during MC is yet to be determined. Sensorial saturation appeared to help when used in conjunction with the local anesthesia techniques. What is Known: • Male circumcision is a painful procedure and it is frequently performed with inappropriate analgesic methods. • A gold standard practice in analgesia during male circumcision is still lacking and there is a great variability in the modus operandi between centers. What is New: • The combination of RB + EMLA + sucrose appears to be an analgesic strategy superior to other approaches. • We advocate for the integration of sensorial saturation during male circumcision in order to improve the efficacy of current analgesic practices.

Indexed as

Circumcision, MaleAnesthetics, LocalHumansInfant, NewbornLidocaineLidocaine, Prilocaine Drug CombinationMalePainPrilocaineAnesthetics, LocalLidocaineLidocaine, Prilocaine Drug CombinationPrilocaineAnalgesiaMale circumcisionNewborn painSensorial saturation

Identifiers

PMID32748017
PMCPMC7782363
OpenAlexW3046718492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.