ReviewDer Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete2020
[Computer-assisted skin cancer diagnosis : Is it time for artificial intelligence in clinical practice?]
Review in Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Multitask Deep Learning Approach for Tumor Segmentation and Morphological Quantification in Acral Melanoma Whole-Slide Images.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being used in medical practice. Especially in the image-based diagnosis of skin cancer, AI shows great potential. However, there is a significant discrepancy between expectations and true relevance of AI in current dermatological practice.
objectivesThis article summarizes promising study results of skin cancer diagnosis by computer-based diagnostic systems and discusses their significance for daily practice. We hereby focus on the analysis of dermoscopic images of pigmented and unpigmented skin lesions. MATERIALS AND
methodsA selective literature search for recent relevant trials was conducted. The included studies used machine learning, and in particular "convolutional neural networks", which have been shown to be particularly effective for the classification of image data. RESULTS AND
conclusionsIn numerous studies, computer algorithms were able to detect pigmented and nonpigmented neoplasms of the skin with high precision, comparable to that of dermatologists. The combination of the physician's assessment and AI showed the best results. Computer-based diagnostic systems are widely accepted among patients and physicians. However, they are still not applicable in daily practice, since computer-based diagnostic systems have only been tested in an experimental environment. In addition, many digital diagnostic criteria that help AI to classify skin lesions remain unclear. This lack of transparency still needs to be addressed. Moreover, clinical studies on the use of AI-based assistance systems are needed in order to prove its applicability in daily dermatologic practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32747996What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.