ArticleRomanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie2020
Fenestration of the cervical internal carotid artery misdiagnosed as dissection.
Article in Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic challenges in internal carotid artery fenestration: a 78-year-old woman presenting with transient ischemic attack-a case report.Journal of medical case reports · 2026Article
- Right non-bifurcating cervical carotid artery with a long-segment incomplete carotid bifurcation, a right accessory middle cerebral artery arising from a common trunk with a cortical branch at the distal A1 segment.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2026Article
- Internal carotid artery fenestration with contralateral internal carotid artery dissection: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Cervical internal carotid artery fenestration: a rare cause of lumen "dissection''.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Internal carotid artery (ICA) anatomical variations are relatively rare occurrences during diagnostic imaging procedures. Their presence can have important prognostic consequences in the evaluation of vascular neurological diseases. It is therefore important to have a good knowledge about these variations, in order to avoid unwarranted medical interventions. We present the case of a patient harboring a right ICA fenestration in the cervical segment, misdiagnosed as a dissection on computed tomography angiography, admitted in the Department of Neurology and treated accordingly. The possible pathological and embryological origins of arterial fenestrations are discussed, and a brief review of the literature related to ICA fenestrations is presented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.