Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32747572›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Cognitive control increases honesty in cheaters but cheating in those who are honest.

Sebastian P H Speer, Ale Smidts, Maarten A S Boksem

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Distinguishing deception from its confounds by improving the validity of fMRI-based neural prediction.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Effect of Comparative Direction and Comparative Gap on Self-Deception.Psychology research and behavior management · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Neural mechanisms of deliberate dishonesty: Dissociating deliberation from other control processes during dishonest behaviors.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  19. Cognitive Control Promotes Either Honesty or Dishonesty, Depending on One's Moral Default.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sebastian P H SpeerRotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University, 3062 PA Rotterdam, The Netherlands speer@rsm.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-3803-7661
Ale SmidtsRotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University, 3062 PA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Maarten A S BoksemRotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University, 3062 PA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus University Rotterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Every day, we are faced with the conflict between the temptation to cheat for financial gains and maintaining a positive image of ourselves as being a "good person." While it has been proposed that cognitive control is needed to mediate this conflict between reward and our moral self-image, the exact role of cognitive control in (dis)honesty remains elusive. Here we identify this role, by investigating the neural mechanism underlying cheating. We developed a task which allows for inconspicuously measuring spontaneous cheating on a trial-by-trial basis in the MRI scanner. We found that activity in the nucleus accumbens promotes cheating, particularly for individuals who cheat a lot, while a network consisting of posterior cingulate cortex, temporoparietal junction, and medial prefrontal cortex promotes honesty, particularly in individuals who are generally honest. Finally, activity in areas associated with cognitive control (anterior cingulate cortex and inferior frontal gyrus) helped dishonest participants to be honest, whereas it enabled cheating for honest participants. Thus, our results suggest that cognitive control is not needed to be honest or dishonest per se but that it depends on an individual's moral default.

Indexed as

CognitionDeceptionAdolescentAdultBrain MappingDecision MakingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMoralsPrefrontal CortexRewardYoung Adultcognitive controldishonestyfMRIreward anticipationself-referential thinking

Identifiers

PMID32747572
PMCPMC7430999
OpenAlexW3047409021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.