Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32747181›Full record

ArticleAcademic radiology2020

Medical Student Education Roadblock Due to COVID-19: Virtual Radiology Core Clerkship to the Rescue.

Sara M Durfee, Robin P Goldenson, Ritu R Gill, Sandra P Rincon, Elisa Flower, Laura L Avery

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Academic radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
16.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 128 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Considerations for Designing and Implementing a Multi-institution Undergraduate Medical Education Experience.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sara M DurfeeDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115. Electronic address: sdurfee@bwh.harvard.edu.
Robin P GoldensonDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115.
Ritu R GillDepartment of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Sandra P RinconMassachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Elisa FlowerDepartment of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Laura L AveryMassachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Harvard University · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RATIONALE AND

objectivesMedical schools were upended by the COVID-19 pandemic, resulting in suspension of all in-person educational activities, and leaving clinical clerkships on hold indefinitely. A virtual curriculum and novel teaching methods were needed to fulfill curricular requirements. We developed a comprehensive virtual radiology clerkship and evaluated the efficacy of this novel method of teaching. MATERIALS AND

methodsA 4-week virtual radiology clerkship was designed to accommodate medical students who had not yet completed the required clerkship. The design included online flipped classroom modules, large group didactic lectures, and small group homeroom activities. Student performance was assessed via a standardized online final exam. Feedback from students was collected using online surveys. Student performance was compared to the in-person radiology clerkship.

resultsOne hundred and eleven medical students were enrolled in the virtual radiology clerkship. Final exam scores were similar to the in-person clerkship. Students indicated that small group homeroom activities had the highest overall satisfaction. Students recognized enthusiastic teachers regardless of class format. Exceptional course content and organization were also noted. Course weaknesses included didactic lecture content which was repetitive or too advanced, the limited opportunity to build personal connections with faculty, and scheduling conflicts with other competing school activities.

conclusionA completely virtual radiology core clerkship can be a successful educational experience for medical students during a time when remote learning is required. A small group learning environment is most successful for student engagement. Personal connections between faculty and students can be challenging in a virtual course.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusClinical ClerkshipCoronavirus InfectionsPandemicsPneumonia, ViralStudents, MedicalCOVID-19CurriculumHumansSARS-CoV-2CoronavirusCOVID-19Medical educationPandemicRadiology

Identifiers

PMID32747181
PMCPMC7380233
OpenAlexW3044936828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.