Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32747148›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nursing studies2020

The impact of moving to a 12h shift pattern on employee wellbeing: A qualitative study in an acute mental health setting.

Jane Suter, Tina Kowalski, Misael Anaya-Montes, Martin Chalkley, Rowena Jacobs, Idaira Rodriguez-Santana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nursing studies, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jane SuterThe York Management School, University of York, Freboys Lane, Heslington, York YO10 5GD, UK. Electronic address: jane.suter@york.ac.uk.
Tina KowalskiThe York Management School, University of York, Freboys Lane, Heslington, York YO10 5GD, UK.
Misael Anaya-MontesCentre for Health Economics, Centre for Health Economics, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Martin ChalkleyCentre for Health Economics, Centre for Health Economics, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Rowena JacobsCentre for Health Economics, Centre for Health Economics, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Idaira Rodriguez-SantanaCentre for Health Economics, Centre for Health Economics, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 204829
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAgainst a backdrop of increasing demand for mental health services, and difficulties in recruitment and retention of mental health staff, employers may consider implementation of 12 h shifts to reduce wage costs. Mixed evidence regarding the impact of 12 h shifts may arise because research is conducted in divergent contexts. Much existing research is cross sectional in design and evaluates impact during the honeymoon phase of implementation. Previous research has not examined the impact of 12 h shifts in mental health service settings.

objectiveTo evaluate how employees in acute mental health settings adapt and respond to a new 12 h shift system from a wellbeing perspective.

designA qualitative approach was adopted to enable analysis of subjective employee experiences of changes to organisation contextual features arising from the shift pattern change, and to explore how this shapes wellbeing. SETTING(S): Six acute mental health wards in the same geographical area of a large mental health care provider within the National Health Service in England.

participants70 participants including modern matrons, ward managers, clinical leads, staff nurses and healthcare assistants.

methodsSemi-structured interviews with 35 participants at 6 months post-implementation of a new 12 h shift pattern, with a further 35 interviewed at 12 months post-implementation.

resultsThematic analysis identified unintended consequences of 12 h shifts as these patterns changed roles and the delivery of care, diminishing perceptions of quality of patient care, opportunities for social support, with reports of pacing work to preserve emotional and physical stamina. These features were moderated by older age, commitment to the public healthcare sector, and fit to individual circumstances in the non-work domain leading to divergent work-life balance outcomes.

conclusionsFindings indicate potential exists for differential wellbeing outcomes of a 12 h shift pattern and negative effects are exacerbated in a stressful and dynamic acute mental health ward context. In a tight labour market with an ageing workforce, employee flexibility and choice are key to retention and wellbeing. Compulsory 12 h shift patterns should be avoided in this setting.

Indexed as

Mental HealthNursesState MedicineAgedCross-Sectional StudiesEnglandFemaleHumansMaleQualitative Research12 h shiftsExtended working hoursMental health servicesQualitativeSocial supportWellbeingWork-life balance

Identifiers

PMID32747148
PMCPMC7695681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.