Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32746847›Full record

ArticleNutrition journal2020

Fruit and vegetable consumption before and during pregnancy and birth weight of new-borns in Japan: the Tohoku medical megabank project birth and three-generation cohort study.

Yudai Yonezawa, Taku Obara, Takahiro Yamashita, Junichi Sugawara, Mami Ishikuro, Keiko Murakami, Aoi Noda, Fumihiko Ueno, Shigenori Suzuki, Hiroyuki Suganuma and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrition journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yudai YonezawaTohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Taku ObaraTohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan. obara-t@hosp.tohoku.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-3674-1674
Takahiro YamashitaTohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Junichi SugawaraTohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Mami IshikuroTohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Keiko MurakamiTohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Aoi NodaTohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Fumihiko UenoTohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Shigenori SuzukiInnovation Division, KAGOME CO., LTD., Nasushiobara, Japan.
Hiroyuki SuganumaInnovation Division, KAGOME CO., LTD., Nasushiobara, Japan.
Shinichi KuriyamaTohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Tohoku University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAssociations of fruit and vegetable consumption before and during pregnancy with birth weight of new-borns and the risk of low birth weight (LBW) remain unclear.

methodsBetween July 2013 and March 2017, we recruited 23,406 pregnant women in the Tohoku Medical Megabank Project Birth and Three-Generation Cohort Study (TMM BirThree Cohort Study). Fruit and vegetable consumption before and during pregnancy was calculated using food frequency questionnaires. Information regarding birth weight was obtained from medical records, and LBW was defined as < 2500 g. We used a multivariable linear regression model and a multivariate logistic regression model to assess associations between fruit and vegetable consumption and birth weight/risk of LBW.

resultsIn total, 17,610 women were included in the analysis. Mean birth weight was 3061.8 ± 354.1 g, and 5.4% of the new-borns had LBW. Compared to women in the lowest quartile of fruit consumption between pre- and early pregnancy, women in the highest quartile had heavier new-borns (β = 49.4; 95% CI: 34.1-64.7) and lower risk of LBW (OR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.65-0.95). Women in the highest quartile of fruit consumption from early to mid-pregnancy also had heavier new-borns (β = 32.3; 95% CI: 17.1-47.6), and they tended to have lower risk of LBW (OR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.69-1.01). Results of analysing the association between changes in fruit consumption from pre- to mid-pregnancy and birth outcomes revealed that women with continuous high fruit consumption from pre- to mid-pregnancy had heavier new-borns (β = 37.6; 95% CI: 25.0-50.3), but they did not have lower risk of LBW (OR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.77-1.06). Associations involving vegetable consumption and birth weight/risk of LBW were not observed.

conclusionsFruit consumption before and during pregnancy was positively associated with birth weight of new-borns and negatively associated with risk of LBW.

Indexed as

FruitVegetablesBirth WeightCohort StudiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornJapanPregnancyRisk FactorsBirth weightFruitPregnancyVegetables

Identifiers

PMID32746847
PMCPMC7401206
OpenAlexW3047499895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.