Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32746789›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2020

Multi-service prevention programs for pregnant and parenting women with substance use and multiple vulnerabilities: Program structure and clients' perspectives on wraparound programming.

Deborah Rutman, Carol Hubberstey, Nancy Poole, Rose A Schmidt, Marilyn Van Bibber

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Deborah RutmanPrincipal, Nota Bene Consulting Group, 1434 Vining St, V8R 1P8, Victoria, BC, Canada. drutman@uvic.ca.
Carol HubbersteyPrincipal, Nota Bene Consulting Group, 1434 Vining St, V8R 1P8, Victoria, BC, Canada.
Nancy PooleCentre of Excellence for Women's Health, V6H 3N1, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Rose A SchmidtCentre of Excellence for Women's Health, V6H 3N1, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Marilyn Van BibberPrincipal, Nota Bene Consulting Group, 1434 Vining St, V8R 1P8, Victoria, BC, Canada.

Funding

Public Health Agency of Canada Project #1617-HQ-000070
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Canada, several community-based, multi-service programs aimed at reaching vulnerable pregnant or parenting women with substance use and complex issues have emerged. These programs offer basic needs and social supports along with perinatal, primary, and mental health care, as well as substance use services. Evaluations of these 'one-stop' programs have demonstrated positive outcomes; nevertheless, few published studies have focused on how these programs are structured, on their cross-sectoral partnerships, and on clients' perceptions of their services.

methodsThe Co-Creating Evidence (CCE) project was a three-year evaluation of eight multi-service programs located in six Canadian jurisdictions. The study used a mixed-methods design involving semi-structured interviews, questionnaires, output data, and de-identified client data. This article focuses on qualitative interviews undertaken with 125 clients during the first round of site visits, supplemented by interview data with program staff and service partners.

resultsEach of the programs in the CCE study employs a multi-service model that both reflects a wrap-around approach to care and is intentionally geared to removing barriers to accessing services. The programs are either operated by a health authority (n = 4) or by a community-based agency (n = 4). The programs' focus on the social determinants of health, and their provision of primary, prenatal, perinatal and mental health care services is essential; similarly, on-site substance use and trauma/violence related services is pivotal. Further, programs' support in relation to women's child welfare issues promotes collaboration, common understanding of expectations, and helps to prevent child/infant removals.

conclusionsThe programs involved in the Co-Creating Evidence study have impressively blended social and primary care and prenatal care. Their success in respectfully and flexibly responding to women's diverse needs, interests and readiness, within a community-based, wraparound service delivery model paves the way for others offering pre- and postnatal programming.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthSocial SupportAdultCanadaChild, PreschoolChild WelfareCounselingDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInterdisciplinary CommunicationParentsPatient Care TeamPregnancyclient perspectivesFASD preventiongendermulti-service program deliveryprogram evaluationservice organizationsocial determinants of healthsubstance use

Identifiers

PMID32746789
PMCPMC7397660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.