Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32746762›Full record

SynthesisJournal of telemedicine and telecare2022

Economic evaluation and costs of telepsychiatry programmes: A systematic review.

John A Naslund, Lauren M Mitchell, Udita Joshi, Dipal Nagda, Chunling Lu

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of telemedicine and telecare, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Primary Care Physician Adherence to Telepsychiatry Recommendations: Intermediate Outcomes from a Randomized Clinical Trial.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2022
    Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Telepsychiatry in the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorders.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

John A NaslundDepartment of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6777-0104
Lauren M MitchellHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5731-9299
Udita JoshiSangath, Bhopal, India.
Dipal NagdaHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Chunling LuDepartment of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Harvard University · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USSangath · IN

Funding

ESSENCE (Enabling translation of Science to Service to ENhance Depression CarE) Scale-UpU19MH113211 · NIMH · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI PATEL, VIKRAM H · 2017 to 2023
$3.7M
NIMH NIH HHS U19 MH113211
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTelepsychiatry involves use of telecommunications technology to deliver psychiatric care and offers promise to reduce costs and increase access to mental health services. This systematic review examined cost reporting of telepsychiatry programmes for mental healthcare.

methodsWe systematically searched electronic databases for studies reporting costs, including economic evaluations such as cost-effectiveness analyses, or costs of developing telepsychiatry programmes for clinical care of mental disorders. Included studies enrolled participants with mental disorders and involved telepsychiatry for depression, anxiety disorders, serious mental illnesses including schizophrenia spectrum disorders and bipolar disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, dementia or epilepsy.

resultsTwenty-six unique studies met inclusion criteria (17,967 participants), with most targeting depression (

conclusionCosts of telepsychiatry programmes varied widely, with substantial heterogeneity in how costs were defined and reported. Some programmes cost less than in-person services while others cost more. Therefore, rigorous cost-effectiveness studies following established standards in economic evaluation are needed to inform implementation and sustainability of these programmes in health systems.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersMental Health ServicesPsychiatryTelemedicineAgedChildCost-Benefit AnalysisHumanscostcost-effectivenesseconomicinterventionmental healthremote technologytelehealthTelepsychiatry

Identifiers

PMID32746762
PMCPMC11694481
OpenAlexW3047550879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.