ArticleIEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control2021
Closed-Loop Low-Rank Echocardiographic Artifact Removal.
Article in IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- In Vivo Longitudinal Monitoring of Cardiac Remodeling in Murine Ischemia Models With Adaptive Bayesian Regularized Cardiac Strain Imaging: Validation Against Histology.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Echocardiographic image sequences are frequently corrupted by quasi-static artifacts ("clutter") superimposed on the moving myocardium. Conventionally, localized blind source separation methods exploiting local correlation in the clutter have proven effective in the suppression of these artifacts. These methods use the spectral characteristics to distinguish the clutter from tissue and background noise and are applied exhaustively over the data set. The exhaustive application results in high computational complexity and a loss of useful tissue signal. In this article, we develop a closed-loop algorithm in which the clutter is first detected using an adaptively determined weighting function and then removed using low-rank estimation methods. We show that our method is adaptable to different low-rank estimators, by presenting two such estimators: sparse coding in the principal component domain and nuclear norm minimization. We compare the performance of our proposed method (CLEAR) with two methods: singular value filtering (SVF) and morphological component analysis (MCA). The performance was quantified in silico by measuring the error with respect to a known "ground truth" data set with no clutter for different combinations of moving clutter and tissue. Our method retains more tissue with a lower error of 3.88 ± 0.093 dB (sparse coding) and 3.47 ± 0.78 (nuclear norm) compared with the benchmark methods 8.5 ± 0.7 dB (SVF) and 9.3 ± 0.5 dB (MCA) particularly in instances where the rate of tissue motion and artifact motion is small (≤0.25 periods of center frequency per frame) while producing comparable clutter reduction performance. CLEAR was also validated in vivo by quantifying the tracking error over the cardiac cycle on five mouse heart data sets with synthetic clutter. CLEAR reduced the error by approximately 50%, compared with 25% for the SVF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.