Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32746196›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control2021

Transcranial Focused Ultrasound for Noninvasive Neuromodulation of the Visual Cortex.

Gengxi Lu, Xuejun Qian, Johnny Castillo, Runze Li, Laiming Jiang, Haotian Lu, K Kirk Shung, Mark S Humayun, Biju B Thomas, Qifa Zhou

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Visual neuroprosthesis: present and future perspectives.Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czechoslovakia · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Ultrasound stimulation for non-invasive visual prostheses.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gengxi Lu
Xuejun Qian
Johnny Castillo
Runze Li
Laiming Jiang
Haotian Lu
K Kirk Shung
Mark S Humayun
Biju B Thomas
Qifa Zhou
University of Southern California · USUltrasonic Technologies (United States) · USSouthern California Eye Institute · US

Funding

Ophthalmic Therapeutics Engineering CoreP30EY029220 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Mahnaz Shahidi · 2018 to 2026
$6.5M
High-resolution Elastographic Assessment of the Optic Nerve HeadR01EY028662 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI CHEN, ZHONGPING, SIGAL, IAN A · 2018 to 2021
$2.7M
High Resolution Elastograpy of Retina Under Prosthetic Electrical StimulationR01EY026091 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI CHEN, ZHONGPING, ZHOU, QIFA · 2016 to 2019
$2.0M
Non-invasive Ultrasound Stimulated Retinal ProsthesisR01EY030126 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI ZHOU, QIFA · 2019 to 2022
$2.0M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY029220NEI NIH HHS R01 EY026091NEI NIH HHS R01 EY028662NEI NIH HHS R01 EY030126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, blindness cannot be cured and patients' living quality can be compromised severely. Ultrasonic (US) neuromodulation is a promising technology for the development of noninvasive cortical visual prosthesis. We investigated the feasibility of transcranial focused ultrasound (tFUS) for noninvasive stimulation of the visual cortex (VC) to develop improved visual prosthesis. tFUS was used to successfully evoke neural activities in the VC of both normal and retinal degenerate (RD) blind rats. Our results showed that blind rats showed more robust responses to ultrasound stimulation when compared with normal rats. ( , two-sample t-test). Three different types of ultrasound waveforms were used in the three experimental groups. Different types of cortical activities were observed when different US waveforms were used. In all rats, when stimulated with continuous ultrasound waves, only short-duration responses were observed at "US on and off" time points. In comparison, pulsed waves (PWs) evoked longer low-frequency responses. Testing different parameters of PWs showed that a pulse repetition frequency higher than 100 Hz is required to obtain the low-frequency responses. Based on the observed cortical activities, we inferred that acoustic radiation force (ARF) is the predominant physical mechanism of ultrasound neuromodulation.

Indexed as

Visual CortexAnimalsHumansRatsUltrasonic WavesUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID32746196
PMCPMC8153235
OpenAlexW3040309034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.