ArticleIEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering2021
Multi-Tissue Analysis on the Impact of Electroporation on Electrical and Thermal Properties.
Article in IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nano-in-Micro GelMA depots assist electro-thermal-immuno orchestral treatment for solid triple negative breast tumor.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Thermal effects of the anovoBMC surgery · 2025Article
- Pulsed field ablation in medicine: irreversible electroporation and electropermeabilization theory and applications.Radiology and oncology · 2025Review
- Toward Large Ablations With Single-Needle High-Frequency Irreversible Electroporation In Vivo.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2025Article
- Power-Driven Electroporation Is Predictive of Treatment Outcomes in a Conductivity-Independent Manner.BME frontiers · 2025Article
- Advances in irreversible electroporation for prostate cancer.Discover oncology · 2024Review
- Electroporation-Based Biopsy Treatment Planning with Numerical Models and Tissue Phantoms.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2024Article
- PIRET-A Platform for Treatment Planning in Electroporation-Based Therapies.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2023Article
- Effects of Electrode-Tissue Proximity on Cardiac Lesion Formation Using Pulsed Field Ablation.Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology · 2022Article
- Human cardiomyocytes are more susceptible to irreversible electroporation by pulsed electric field than human esophageal cells.Physiological reports · 2022Article
- A Comparative Modeling Study of Thermal Mitigation Strategies in Irreversible Electroporation Treatments.Journal of heat transfer · 2022Article
- Novel platinum bipolar electrode for irreversible electroporation in prostate cancer: preclinical study in the beagle prostate.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Rapid Impedance Spectroscopy for Monitoring Tissue Impedance, Temperature, and Treatment Outcome During Electroporation-Based Therapies.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2021Article
- Temperature Distribution on Classical Two Needles IRE Setup Versus a Single Needle Prototype.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTissue electroporation is achieved by applying a series of electric pulses to destabilize cell membranes within the target tissue. The treatment volume is dictated by the electric field distribution, which depends on the pulse parameters and tissue type and can be readily predicted using numerical methods. These models require the relevant tissue properties to be known beforehand. This study aims to quantify electrical and thermal properties for three different tissue types relevant to current clinical electroporation.
methodsPancreatic, brain, and liver tissue were harvested from pigs, then treated with IRE pulses in a parallel-plate configuration. Resulting current and temperature readings were used to calculate the conductivity and its temperature dependence for each tissue type. Finally, a computational model was constructed to examine the impact of differences between tissue types.
resultsBaseline conductivity values (mean 0.11, 0.14, and 0.12 S/m) and temperature coefficients of conductivity (mean 2.0, 2.3, and 1.2 % per degree Celsius) were calculated for pancreas, brain, and liver, respectively. The accompanying computational models suggest field distribution and thermal damage volumes are dependent on tissue type.
conclusionThe three tissue types show similar electrical and thermal responses to IRE, though brain tissue exhibits the greatest differences. The results also show that tissue type plays a role in the expected ablation and thermal damage volumes. SIGNIFICANCE: The conductivity and its changes due to heating are expected to have a marked impact on the ablation volume. Incorporating these tissue properties aids in the prediction and optimization of electroporation-based therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.