Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32746081›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering2021

Multi-Tissue Analysis on the Impact of Electroporation on Electrical and Thermal Properties.

Natalie Beitel-White, Melvin F Lorenzo, Yajun Zhao, Rebecca M Brock, Sheryl Coutermarsh-Ott, Irving C Allen, Navid Manuchehrabadi, Rafael V Davalos

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Thermal effects of the anovoBMC surgery · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. PIRET-A Platform for Treatment Planning in Electroporation-Based Therapies.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Natalie Beitel-White
Melvin F Lorenzo
Yajun Zhao
Rebecca M Brock
Sheryl Coutermarsh-Ott
Irving C Allen
Navid Manuchehrabadi
Rafael V Davalos
Virginia Tech · USVirginia–Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine · USAngioDynamics (United States) · US

Funding

Sub-component for Institution # 16-01848 Novel moleculary targeted therapy of GBMP01CA207206 · NCI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI DEBINSKI, WALDEMAR · 2017 to 2021
$9.0M
Development and application of non-thermal high frequency IRE to treat hepatic tumorsR01CA240476 · NCI · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI DAVALOS, RAFAEL VIDAL · 2020 to 2024
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA207206NCI NIH HHS R01 CA240476
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTissue electroporation is achieved by applying a series of electric pulses to destabilize cell membranes within the target tissue. The treatment volume is dictated by the electric field distribution, which depends on the pulse parameters and tissue type and can be readily predicted using numerical methods. These models require the relevant tissue properties to be known beforehand. This study aims to quantify electrical and thermal properties for three different tissue types relevant to current clinical electroporation.

methodsPancreatic, brain, and liver tissue were harvested from pigs, then treated with IRE pulses in a parallel-plate configuration. Resulting current and temperature readings were used to calculate the conductivity and its temperature dependence for each tissue type. Finally, a computational model was constructed to examine the impact of differences between tissue types.

resultsBaseline conductivity values (mean 0.11, 0.14, and 0.12 S/m) and temperature coefficients of conductivity (mean 2.0, 2.3, and 1.2 % per degree Celsius) were calculated for pancreas, brain, and liver, respectively. The accompanying computational models suggest field distribution and thermal damage volumes are dependent on tissue type.

conclusionThe three tissue types show similar electrical and thermal responses to IRE, though brain tissue exhibits the greatest differences. The results also show that tissue type plays a role in the expected ablation and thermal damage volumes. SIGNIFICANCE: The conductivity and its changes due to heating are expected to have a marked impact on the ablation volume. Incorporating these tissue properties aids in the prediction and optimization of electroporation-based therapies.

Indexed as

ElectricityElectroporationAnimalsElectric ConductivityLiverSwineTemperature

Identifiers

PMID32746081
PMCPMC8048145
OpenAlexW3047521080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.