Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32746047›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering2021

Reconstruction of Organ Boundaries With Deep Learning in the D-Bar Method for Electrical Impedance Tomography.

Michael Capps, Jennifer L Mueller

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael Capps
Jennifer L Mueller
Colorado State University · US

Funding

An integrated electrical impedance/ultrasound tomography system for pulmonary monitoring and diagnosisR21EB024683 · NIBIB · COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MUELLER, JENNIFER LYNN · 2017 to 2019
$560k
NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB024683
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMedical electrical impedance tomography is a non-ionizing imaging modality in which low-amplitude, low-frequency currents are applied on electrodes on the body, the resulting voltages are measured, and an inverse problem is solved to determine the conductivity distribution in the region of interest. Due the ill-posedness of the inverse problem, the boundaries of internal organs are typically blurred in the reconstructed image.

methodsA deep learning approach is introduced in the D-bar method for reconstructing a 2-D slice of the thorax to recover the boundaries of organs. This is accomplished by training a deep neural network on labeled pairs of scattering transforms and the boundaries of the organs in the data from which the transforms were computed. This allows the network to "learn" the nonlinear mapping between them by minimizing the error between the output of the network and known actual boundaries. Further, a "sparse" reconstruction is computed by fusing the results of the standard D-bar reconstruction with reconstructed organ boundaries from the neural network.

resultsResults are shown on simulated and experimental data collected on a saline-filled tank with agar targets simulating the conductivity of the heart and lungs. CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE: The results demonstrate that deep neural networks can successfully learn the mapping between scattering transforms and the internal boundaries of structures.

Indexed as

Deep LearningTomographyAlgorithmsElectric ImpedanceImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPhantoms, Imaging

Identifiers

PMID32746047
PMCPMC8061747
OpenAlexW3039123483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.