ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2020
A parietal region processing numerosity of observed actions: An FMRI study.
Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Number-action coupling across the lifespan: Sensorimotor foundations of numerical cognition.iScience · 2026Review
- Sensorimotor transformation of number in the primate parietal cortex.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Numerosity estimation in children with ADHD across space, time, vision and action.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- Brain Representation of Numerosity across the Senses and Presentation Formats.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Number selective sensorimotor neurons in the crow translate perceived numerosity into number of actions.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Electrophysiological Evidence for A Number-Action Mapping in Infancy.Brain sciences · 2022Article
- A parietal region processing numerosity of observed actions: An FMRI study.The European journal of neuroscience · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
When observing others' behavior, it is important to perceive not only the identity of the observed actions (OAs), but also the number of times they were performed. Given the mounting evidence implicating posterior parietal cortex in action observation, and in particular that of manipulative actions, the aim of this study was to identify the parietal region, if any, that contributes to the processing of observed manipulative action (OMA) numerosity, using the functional magnetic resonance imaging technique. Twenty-one right-handed healthy volunteers performed two discrimination tasks while in the scanner, responding to video stimuli in which an actor performed manipulative actions on colored target balls that appeared four times consecutively. The subjects discriminated between two small numerosities of either OMAs ("Action" condition) or colors of balls ("Ball" condition). A significant difference between the "Action" and "Ball" conditions was observed in occipito-temporal cortex and the putative human anterior intraparietal sulcus (phAIP) area as well as the third topographic map of numerosity-selective neurons at the post-central sulcus (NPC3) of the left parietal cortex. A further region of interest analysis of the group-average data showed that at the single voxel level the latter area, more than any other parietal or occipito-temporal numerosity map, favored numerosity of OAs. These results suggest that phAIP processes the identity of OMAs, while neighboring NPC3 likely processes the numerosity of the identified OAs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.