Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32745259›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cancer2021

A gene expression-based single sample predictor of lung adenocarcinoma molecular subtype and prognosis.

Helena Liljedahl, Anna Karlsson, Gudrun N Oskarsdottir, Annette Salomonsson, Hans Brunnström, Gigja Erlingsdottir, Mats Jönsson, Sofi Isaksson, Elsa Arbajian, Cristian Ortiz-Villalón and 12 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. DeSide: A unified deep learning approach for cellular deconvolution of tumor microenvironment.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [DEPDC1 is Highly Expressed in Lung Adenocarcinoma and Promotes Tumor Cell Proliferation].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Helena LiljedahlDivision of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Medicon Village, Lund, Sweden.
Anna KarlssonDivision of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Medicon Village, Lund, Sweden.
Gudrun N OskarsdottirDivision of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Medicon Village, Lund, Sweden.
Annette SalomonssonDivision of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Medicon Village, Lund, Sweden.
Hans BrunnströmDivision of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Medicon Village, Lund, Sweden.
Gigja ErlingsdottirDepartment of Pathology, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Mats JönssonDivision of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Medicon Village, Lund, Sweden.
Sofi IsakssonDivision of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Medicon Village, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-0051-8507
Elsa ArbajianDivision of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Medicon Village, Lund, Sweden.
Cristian Ortiz-VillalónDepartment of Pathology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Aziz HusseinDepartment of Pathology and Cytology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Bengt BergmanDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Anders VikströmDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, University Hospital Linköping, Linköping, Sweden.
Nastaran MonsefDepartment of Pathology and Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Eva BrandenRespiratory Medicine Unit, Department of Medicine Solna and CMM, Karolinska Institute and Karolinska University Hospital Solna, Stockholm, Sweden.
Hirsh KoyiRespiratory Medicine Unit, Department of Medicine Solna and CMM, Karolinska Institute and Karolinska University Hospital Solna, Stockholm, Sweden.
Luigi de PetrisThoracic Oncology Unit, Karolinska University Hospital and Department Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Annika PattheyDepartment of Medical Biosciences, Pathology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Annelie F BehndigDepartment of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Division of Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Mikael JohanssonDepartment of Radiation Sciences, Oncology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Maria PlanckDivision of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Medicon Village, Lund, Sweden.
Johan StaafDivision of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Medicon Village, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-5254-5115
Lund University · SEUmeå University · SEKarolinska University Hospital · SESahlgrenska University Hospital · SEUppsala University · SELinköping University · SELinköping University Hospital · SEReykjavík University · IS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disease recurrence in surgically treated lung adenocarcinoma (AC) remains high. New approaches for risk stratification beyond tumor stage are needed. Gene expression-based AC subtypes such as the Cancer Genome Atlas Network (TCGA) terminal-respiratory unit (TRU), proximal-inflammatory (PI) and proximal-proliferative (PP) subtypes have been associated with prognosis, but show methodological limitations for robust clinical use. We aimed to derive a platform independent single sample predictor (SSP) for molecular subtype assignment and risk stratification that could function in a clinical setting. Two-class (TRU/nonTRU=SSP2) and three-class (TRU/PP/PI=SSP3) SSPs using the AIMS algorithm were trained in 1655 ACs (n = 9659 genes) from public repositories vs TCGA centroid subtypes. Validation and survival analysis were performed in 977 patients using overall survival (OS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) as endpoints. In the validation cohort, SSP2 and SSP3 showed accuracies of 0.85 and 0.81, respectively. SSPs captured relevant biology previously associated with the TCGA subtypes and were associated with prognosis. In survival analysis, OS and DMFS for cases discordantly classified between TCGA and SSP2 favored the SSP2 classification. In resected Stage I patients, SSP2 identified TRU-cases with better OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.30; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.18-0.49) and DMFS (TRU HR = 0.52; 95% CI = 0.33-0.83) independent of age, Stage IA/IB and gender. SSP2 was transformed into a NanoString nCounter assay and tested in 44 Stage I patients using RNA from formalin-fixed tissue, providing prognostic stratification (relapse-free interval, HR = 3.2; 95% CI = 1.2-8.8). In conclusion, gene expression-based SSPs can provide molecular subtype and independent prognostic information in early-stage lung ACs. SSPs may overcome critical limitations in the applicability of gene signatures in lung cancer.

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma of LungAlgorithmsBiomarkers, TumorDatasets as TopicDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansLungLung NeoplasmsMaleModels, GeneticNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPredictive Value of TestsBiomarkers, Tumorgene expressionlung adenocarcinomamolecular subtypesprognosissingle sample predictor

Identifiers

PMID32745259
PMCPMC7689824
OpenAlexW3047474568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.