Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32745143›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Unraveling the mechanisms of resistance to Sclerotium rolfsii in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) using comparative RNA-Seq analysis of resistant and susceptible genotypes.

Tejas C Bosamia, Sneha M Dodia, Gyan P Mishra, Suhail Ahmad, Binal Joshi, Polavakkalipalayam P Thirumalaisamy, Narendra Kumar, Arulthambi L Rathnakumar, Chandramohan Sangh, Abhay Kumar and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Defense to3 Biotech · 2025
    Article
  6. Insights ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Frontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Tejas C BosamiaICAR-Directorate of Groundnut Research (ICAR-DGR), Junagadh, India.
Sneha M DodiaICAR-Directorate of Groundnut Research (ICAR-DGR), Junagadh, India.
Gyan P MishraICAR-Directorate of Groundnut Research (ICAR-DGR), Junagadh, India.
Suhail AhmadICAR-Directorate of Groundnut Research (ICAR-DGR), Junagadh, India.
Binal JoshiICAR-Directorate of Groundnut Research (ICAR-DGR), Junagadh, India.
Polavakkalipalayam P ThirumalaisamyICAR-Directorate of Groundnut Research (ICAR-DGR), Junagadh, India.
Narendra KumarICAR-Directorate of Groundnut Research (ICAR-DGR), Junagadh, India.
Arulthambi L RathnakumarICAR-Directorate of Groundnut Research (ICAR-DGR), Junagadh, India.
Chandramohan SanghICAR-Directorate of Groundnut Research (ICAR-DGR), Junagadh, India.
Abhay KumarICAR-Directorate of Groundnut Research (ICAR-DGR), Junagadh, India.ORCID 0000-0002-1104-6771
Radhakrishnan ThankappanICAR-Directorate of Groundnut Research (ICAR-DGR), Junagadh, India.ORCID 0000-0001-8713-3196
Directorate of Groundnut Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stem rot, a devastating fungal disease of peanut, is caused by Sclerotium rolfsii. RNA-sequencing approaches have been used to unravel the mechanisms of resistance to stem rot in peanut over the course of fungal infection in resistant (NRCG-CS85) and susceptible (TG37A) genotypes under control conditions and during the course of infection. Out of about 290 million reads, nearly 251 million (92.22%) high-quality reads were obtained and aligned to the Arachis duranensis and Arachis ipaensis genomes with the average mapping of 78.91% and 78.61%, respectively. In total, about 48.6% of genes were commonly regulated, while approximately 21.8% and 29.6% of uniquely regulated genes from A. duranensis and A. ipaensis genomes, respectively, were identified. Several annotated transcripts, such as receptor-like kinases, jasmonic acid pathway enzymes, and transcription factors (TFs), including WRKY, Zinc finger protein, and C2-H2 zinc finger, showed higher expression in resistant genotypes upon infection. These transcripts have a known role in channelizing the downstream of pathogen perception. The higher expression of WRKY transcripts might have induced the systemic acquired resistance (SAR) by the activation of the jasmonic acid defense signaling pathway. Furthermore, a set of 30 transcripts involved in the defense mechanisms were validated with quantitative real-time PCR. This study suggested PAMP-triggered immunity as a probable mechanism of resistance, while the jasmonic acid signaling pathway was identified as a possible defense mechanism in peanut. The information generated is of immense importance in developing more effective ways to combat the stem rot disease in peanut.

Indexed as

Plant DiseasesAgaricalesArachisCyclopentanesDNA-Binding ProteinsGenes, PlantGenotypeOxylipinsPhosphotransferases (Phosphate Group Acceptor)Plant Growth RegulatorsPlant ImmunityPlant ProteinsRNA-SeqSignal TransductionTranscription FactorsCyclopentanesDNA-Binding Proteinsjasmonic acidOxylipinsPhosphotransferases (Phosphate Group Acceptor)Plant Growth RegulatorsPlant ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID32745143
PMCPMC7398544
OpenAlexW3047607456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.