Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32744950›Full record

ArticleHealth affairs (Project Hope)2020

Primary Care Providers And Specialists Deliver Comparable Buprenorphine Treatment Quality.

Alex K Gertner, Allison G Robertson, Byron J Powell, Hendree Jones, Pam Silberman, Marisa Elena Domino

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health affairs (Project Hope), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Observational
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alex K GertnerAlex K. Gertner (alex_gertner@med.unc.edu) is an MD/PhD candidate in health policy and management at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, in Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Allison G RobertsonAllison G. Robertson is an associate professor in the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, in Durham, North Carolina.
Byron J PowellByron J. Powell is an assistant professor at the Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, in St. Louis, Missouri.
Hendree JonesHendree Jones is a professor of obstetrics and gynecology at the University of North Carolina School of Medicine, in Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Pam SilbermanPam Silberman is a professor of health policy and management at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Marisa Elena DominoMarisa Elena Domino is a professor of health policy and management at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and the Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USDuke University · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Utilization and Access to Buprenorphine Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder in MedicaidF30DA044668 · NIDA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI GERTNER, ALEX · 2018 to 2022
$176k
NIDA NIH HHS F30 DA044668
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In response to rising numbers of opioid overdose deaths, primary care providers have been called on to play a greater role in delivering buprenorphine treatment for opioid use disorder. However, policy makers and providers have raised concerns that expanding treatment access may reduce treatment quality and that primary care providers are not well equipped to deliver buprenorphine treatment. We investigated two research questions in response to these concerns: How did buprenorphine treatment use and quality change in North Carolina Medicaid from 2014 to 2017, and how did buprenorphine treatment quality differ between primary care providers and specialists in North Carolina Medicaid during this period? We measured buprenorphine treatment quality as patients' retention in treatment and providers' adherence to treatment guidelines. We found that the number of enrollees receiving medication treatment for opioid use disorder increased substantially, but the percentage of enrollees with the disorder receiving treatment remained low. The quality of buprenorphine treatment increased during the study period, and primary care providers provided care of comparable or higher quality compared with that of other providers. Treatment quality for buprenorphine treatment is improving, but there remains room for improvement in both use and quality. Our results support the role of primary care providers in expanding treatment for opioid use disorder.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphineHumansMethadoneNorth CarolinaOpiate Substitution TreatmentOpioid-Related DisordersSpecializationUnited StatesAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphineMethadoneBuprenorphineHealth care providersHealth policyMedicaidMedication assisted treatmentmethadoneNonsubstance related additionsopioid use disorderPatient carePharmaceuticalsQuality improvementQuality measurementQuality of careSubstance use disorder

Identifiers

PMID32744950
PMCPMC7895292
OpenAlexW3047435281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.