Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32744561›Full record

ReviewThe journal of nutrition, health & aging2020

COVID-19, Virology and Geroscience: A Perspective.

C Vellas, P Delobel, P de Souto Barreto, J Izopet

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The journal of nutrition, health & aging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Recent advances in point of care testing for COVID-19 detection.Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. A Review of the Current Status of Clinical Management of COVID-19 in the Elderly.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

C VellasCamille Vellas, INSERM UMR1043 - CNRS UMR5282 Centre de Physiopathologie Toulouse-Purpan (CPTP), Toulouse, France, vellas.camille@gmail.com.
P Delobel
P de Souto Barreto
J Izopet

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A new coronavirus, called SARS-CoV-2, was identified in Wuhan, China, in December 2019. The SARS-CoV-2 spread very rapidly, causing a global pandemic, Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Older adults have higher peak of viral load and, especially those with comorbidities, had higher COVID-19-related fatality rates than younger adults. In this Perspective paper, we summarize current knowledge about SARS-CoV-2 and aging, in order to understand why older people are more affected by COVID-19. We discuss about the possibility that the so-called "immunosenescence" and "inflammaging" processes, already present in a fraction of frail older adults, could allow the immune escape of SARS-CoV-2 leading to COVID-19 serious complications. Finally, we propose to use geroscience approaches to the field of COVID-19.

Indexed as

AgingBetacoronavirusGeriatricsVirologyAgedCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19HumansInflammationPandemicsPneumonia, ViralSARS-CoV-2agingcoronavirusCOVID-19frailtygerosciencepreventionSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID32744561
PMCPMC7301052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.