ArticlemAbs
A general evidence-based sequence variant control limit for recombinant therapeutic protein development.
Article in mAbs. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- A landscape of sequence variants in 51 commercial antibody therapeutics.Antibody therapeutics · 2026Article
- Distinguishing Ile/Leu Variant Ligands in the Immunopeptidome Using Hybrid EAD + CID Fragmentation (ExCID).Analytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Highly variable aggregation and glycosylation profiles and their roles in immunogenicity to protein-based therapeutics.Journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2025Review
- Comparability strategy and demonstration for post-approval production cell line change of a bevacizumab biosimilar IBI305.Antibody therapeutics · 2023Article
- A Spike-Control Approach that Evaluates High Resolution Mass Spectrometry-Based Sequence Variant Analytical Method Performance for Therapeutic Proteins.Pharmaceutical research · 2023Article
- A Highly Efficient Workflow for Detecting and Identifying Sequence Variants in Therapeutic Proteins with a High Resolution LC-MS/MS Method.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Interlaboratory Evaluation of a User-Friendly Benchtop Mass Spectrometer for Multiple-Attribute Monitoring Studies of a Monoclonal Antibody.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Characterization of light chain c-terminal extension sequence variant in one bispecific antibody.Frontiers in chemistry · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sequence variants (SVs) resulting from unintended amino acid substitutions in recombinant therapeutic proteins have increasingly gained attention from both regulatory agencies and the biopharmaceutical industry given their potential impact on efficacy and safety. With well-optimized production systems, such sequence variants usually exist at very low levels in the final protein products due to the high fidelity of DNA replication and protein biosynthesis process in mammalian expression systems such as Chinese hamster ovary cell lines. However, their levels can be significantly elevated in cases where the selected production cell line has unexpected DNA mutations or the manufacturing process is not fully optimized, for example, if depletion of certain amino acids occurs in the cell culture media in bioreactors. Therefore, it is important to design and implement an effective monitoring and control strategy to prevent or minimize the possible risks of SVs during the early stage of product and process development. However, there is no well-established guidance from the regulatory agencies or consensus across the industry to assess and manage SV risks. A question frequently asked is: What levels of SVs can be considered acceptable during product and process development, but also have no negative effects on drug safety and efficacy in patients? To address this critical question, we have taken a holistic approach and conducted a comprehensive sequence variant analysis. To guide biologic development, a general SV control limit of 0.1% at individual amino acid sites was proposed and properly justified based on extensive literature review, SV benchmark survey of approved therapeutic proteins, and accumulated experience on SV control practice at Regeneron.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.