Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32743903›Full record

ArticleAdvanced healthcare materials2020

Neural Progenitor Cells Alter Chromatin Organization and Neurotrophin Expression in Response to 3D Matrix Degradability.

Christopher M Madl, Bauer L LeSavage, Margarita Khariton, Sarah C Heilshorn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced healthcare materials, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Early nervous system development in the chaetognathFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Cell-extracellular matrix mechanotransduction in 3D.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2023
    Review
  11. Engineered hydrogels for mechanobiology.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christopher M MadlDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3221-5041
Bauer L LeSavageDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4897-9436
Margarita KharitonDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7454-7442
Sarah C HeilshornDepartment of Materials Science & Engineering, Stanford University, 476 Lomita Mall, McCullough Room 246, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9801-6304
Stanford University · US

Funding

Engineered matrix microarrays to enhance the regenerative potential of iPSC-derived endothelial cellsR01HL142718 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HEILSHORN, SARAH C, HUANG, NGAN F. · 2018 to 2021
$1.6M
Injectable Hydrogels to Protect Transplanted Cells from HypoxiaR01EB027666 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HEILSHORN, SARAH C, PLANT, GILES · 2019 to 2022
$1.4M
Engineered biomaterials to modulate cell-cell signaling for the robust expansion of stem cellsR01EB027171 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HEILSHORN, SARAH C · 2019 to 2022
$1.4M
Cell Responsive Hydrogels to Improve Functional Recovery after Spinal Cord InjuryF31EB020502 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MADL, CHRISTOPHER MATTHEW · 2015 to 2016
$69k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL142718NIBIB NIH HHS F31 EB020502NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB027171NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB027666
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural progenitor cells (NPCs) are promising therapeutic candidates for nervous system regeneration. Significant efforts focus on developing hydrogel-based approaches to facilitate the clinical translation of NPCs, from scalable platforms for stem cell production to injectable carriers for cell transplantation. However, fundamental questions surrounding NPC-hydrogel interactions remain unanswered. While matrix degradability is known to regulate the stemness and differentiation capacity of NPCs, how degradability impacts NPC epigenetic regulation and secretory phenotype remains unknown. To address this question, NPCs encapsulated in recombinant protein hydrogels with tunable degradability are assayed for changes in chromatin organization and neurotrophin expression. In high degradability gels, NPCs maintain expression of stem cell factors, proliferate, and have large nuclei with elevated levels of the stemness-associated activating histone mark H3K4me3. In contrast, NPCs in low degradability gels exhibit more compact, rounded nuclei with peripherally localized heterochromatin, are non-proliferative yet non-senescent, and maintain expression of neurotrophic factors with potential therapeutic relevance. This work suggests that tuning matrix degradability may be useful to direct NPCs toward either a more-proliferative, stem-like phenotype for cell replacement therapies, or a more quiescent-like, pro-secretory phenotype for soluble factor-mediated therapies.

Indexed as

Nerve Growth FactorsNeural Stem CellsCell DifferentiationChromatinEpigenesis, GeneticChromatinNerve Growth Factorschromatin organizationelastin-like proteinshydrogelsmatrix degradationneural stem/progenitor cells

Identifiers

PMID32743903
PMCPMC7530129
OpenAlexW3047097272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.