Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32743768›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2021

MR image-based radiomics to differentiate type Ι and type ΙΙ epithelial ovarian cancers.

Junming Jian, Yong'ai Li, Perry J Pickhardt, Wei Xia, Zhang He, Rui Zhang, Shuhui Zhao, Xingyu Zhao, Songqi Cai, Jiayi Zhang and 9 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Value of anQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 12 institutions in 2 countries.

Junming Jian *University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 230026, Anhui, China.
Yong'ai Li *Department of Radiology, Jinshan Hospital, Fudan University, 1508 Longhang Road, Jinshan District, Shanghai, 201508, China.
Perry J PickhardtDepartment of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, USA.
Wei XiaSuzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No.88 Keling Road, Suzhou New District, Suzhou, 215163, Jiangsu, China.
Zhang HeDepartment of Radiology, Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, 201508, China.
Rui ZhangSuzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No.88 Keling Road, Suzhou New District, Suzhou, 215163, Jiangsu, China.
Shuhui ZhaoDepartment of Radiology, Xinhua Hospital, Medical College of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200092, China.
Xingyu ZhaoUniversity of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 230026, Anhui, China.
Songqi CaiDepartment of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Jiayi ZhangSuzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No.88 Keling Road, Suzhou New District, Suzhou, 215163, Jiangsu, China.
Guofu ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200082, China.
Jingxuan JiangDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, 226001, Jiangsu, China.
Yan ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, Guangzhou, 511400, Guangdong, China.
Keying WangDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221000, Jiangsu, China.
Guangwu LinDepartment of Radiology, Huadong Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200040, China.
Feng FengDepartment of Radiology, Cancer Hospital, Nantong University, Nantong, 226361, Jiangsu, China.
Xiaodong WuSuzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No.88 Keling Road, Suzhou New District, Suzhou, 215163, Jiangsu, China.
Xin GaoSuzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No.88 Keling Road, Suzhou New District, Suzhou, 215163, Jiangsu, China. xingaosam@yahoo.com.
Jinwei QiangDepartment of Radiology, Jinshan Hospital, Fudan University, 1508 Longhang Road, Jinshan District, Shanghai, 201508, China. dr.jinweiqiang@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6327-1401
Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNJinshan Hospital of Fudan University · CNNantong University · CNUniversity of Science and Technology of China · CNFudan University · CNGuangdong Province Women and Children Hospital · CNObstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CNShanghai Public Health Clinical Center · CNSun Yat-sen University · CNUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · USXuzhou Medical College · CN

Funding

Foundation of Jinshan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University 2018-JSYYQH-03Key R&D Program of Jiangsu BE2017671National Natural Science Foundation of China 61801474National Natural Science Foundation of China 81471628National Natural Science Foundation of China 81501439National Natural Science Foundation of China 81571772National Natural Science Foundation of China 81871439Science and Technology Commission Shanghai Municipality 19411972000Shanghai Municipal Commission 20184Y0049
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesEpithelial ovarian cancers (EOC) can be divided into type I and type II according to etiology and prognosis. Accurate subtype differentiation can substantially impact patient management. In this study, we aimed to construct an MR image-based radiomics model to differentiate between type I and type II EOC.

methodsIn this multicenter retrospective study, a total of 294 EOC patients from January 2010 to February 2019 were enrolled. Quantitative MR imaging features were extracted from the following axial sequences: T2WI FS, DWI, ADC, and CE-T1WI. A combined model was constructed based on the combination of these four MR sequences. The diagnostic performance was evaluated by ROC-AUC. In addition, an occlusion test was carried out to identify the most critical region for EOC differentiation.

resultsThe combined radiomics model exhibited superior diagnostic capability over all four single-parametric radiomics models, both in internal and external validation cohorts (AUC of 0.806 and 0.847, respectively). The occlusion test revealed that the most critical region for differential diagnosis was the border zone between the solid and cystic components, or the less compact areas of solid component on direct visual inspection.

conclusionsMR image-based radiomics modeling can differentiate between type I and type II EOC and identify the most critical region for differential diagnosis. KEY POINTS: • Combined radiomics models exhibited superior diagnostic capability over all four single-parametric radiomics models, both in internal and external validation cohorts (AUC of 0.834 and 0.847, respectively). • The occlusion test revealed that the most crucial region for differentiating type Ι and type ΙΙ EOC was the border zone between the solid and cystic components, or the less compact areas of solid component on direct visual inspection on T2WI FS. • The light-combined model (constructed by T2WI FS, DWI, and ADC sequences) can be used for patients who are not suitable for contrast agent use.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingOvarian NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialFemaleHumansRetrospective StudiesROC CurveDiagnosisEpithelial ovarian cancerMachine learningMagnetic resonance imagingradiomics

Identifiers

PMID32743768
OpenAlexW3046810415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.