Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32743757›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2021

Iterative heuristic design of temporal graphic displays with clinical domain experts.

Thomas J Reese, Noa Segall, Guilherme Del Fiol, Joseph E Tonna, Kensaku Kawamoto, Charlene Weir, Melanie C Wright

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Thomas J ReeseDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah School of Medicine, 421 Wakara Way, Ste 140, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108-3514, USA. Thomas.Reese@hsc.utah.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1081-1670
Noa SegallDepartment of Anesthesiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, USA.
Guilherme Del FiolDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah School of Medicine, 421 Wakara Way, Ste 140, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108-3514, USA.
Joseph E TonnaDivisions of Emergency Medicine and Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, USA.
Kensaku KawamotoDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah School of Medicine, 421 Wakara Way, Ste 140, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108-3514, USA.
Charlene WeirDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah School of Medicine, 421 Wakara Way, Ste 140, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108-3514, USA.
Melanie C WrightCollege of Pharmacy, University of Idaho, Meridian, USA.

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF UTAH MEDICAL INFORMATICS TRAININGT15LM007124 · NLM · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI Karen Louise Eilbeck · 1997 to 2026
$22.0M
Optimizing Selection and Management of Cardiac Arrest Patients Treated with ECMOK23HL141596 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI TONNA, JOSEPH EDWARD · 2018 to 2022
$945k
Right Place, Right Time: Information Design to Support Decisions in Acute CareR56LM011925 · NLM · SAINT ALPHONSUS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER · PI WRIGHT, MELANIE C · 2015 to 2016
$544k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL141596NLM NIH HHS R56 LM011925NLM NIH HHS R56LM011925NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007124NLM NIH HHS T15LM007124
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conventional electronic health record information displays are not optimized for efficient information processing. Graphical displays that integrate patient information can improve information processing, especially in data-rich environments such as critical care. We propose an adaptable and reusable approach to patient information display with modular graphical components (widgets). We had two study objectives. First, reduce numerous widget prototype alternatives to preferred designs. Second, derive widget design feature recommendations. Using iterative human-centered design methods, we interviewed experts to hone design features of widgets displaying frequently measured data elements, e.g., heart rate, for acute care patient monitoring and real-time clinical decision-making. Participant responses to design queries were coded to calculate feature-set agreement, average prototype score, and prototype agreement. Two iterative interview cycles covering 64 design queries and 86 prototypes were needed to reach consensus on six feature sets. Interviewers agreed that line graphs with a smoothed or averaged trendline, 24-h timeframe, and gradient coloring for urgency were useful and informative features. Moreover, users agreed that widgets should include key functions: (1) adjustable reference ranges, (2) expandable timeframes, and (3) access to details on demand. Participants stated graphical widgets would be used to identify correlating patterns and compare abnormal measures across related data elements at a specific time. Combining theoretical principles and validated design methods was an effective and reproducible approach to designing widgets for healthcare displays. The findings suggest our widget design features and recommendations match critical care clinician expectations for graphical information display of continuous and frequently updated patient data.

Indexed as

Data DisplayHeuristicsCritical CareElectronic Health RecordsHumansCritical careData integrationGraphical displayMedical informatics applicationsParticipatory design

Identifiers

PMID32743757
PMCPMC7854828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.