Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32743741›Full record

ArticleNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2020

Can aprepitant used for nausea and vomiting be good gastrointestinal complaints?

Rustem Anil Ugan, Harun Un, Duygu Kose, Elif Cadirci, Tugba Bal Tastan, Muhammed Yayla, Zekai Halici

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Histopathological Overview of Experimental Ulcer Models.The Eurasian journal of medicine · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Rustem Anil UganDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ataturk University, 25240, Erzurum, Turkey. anil.ugan@atauni.edu.tr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4837-2343
Harun UnDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Agri Ibrahim Cecen University, Agri, Turkey.
Duygu KoseDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey.
Elif CadirciDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey.
Tugba Bal TastanDepartment of Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Erzincan Binali Yidirim University, Erzincan, Turkey.
Muhammed YaylaDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Kafkas University, Kars, Turkey.
Zekai HaliciDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey.
Atatürk University · TRAğrı İbrahim Çeçen University · TRErzincan Binali Yıldırım University · TRKafkas University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aprepitant is a selective SP/NK-1 receptor antagonist and used in postoperative and chemotherapeutics induced emesis and vomiting. The aim of our study is to show aprepitant may have beneficial effects on gastrointestinal complaints in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapeutics by indomethacin-induced gastric ulcer model. A total of 48 rats were fasted 24 h for ulcer experiment. Aprepitant doses of 5, 10, 20, and 40 mg/kg were evaluated for their antiulcer activity. Omeprazole (20 mg/kg) was used as a positive control group. Six hours after 25 mg/kg indomethacin administration, all stomachs were dissected out. After macroscopic analyses, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), COX-1, and COX-2 mRNA levels and SOD activity, and GSH and MDA levels of stomachs were determined. Histopathological examinations were evaluated. Aprepitant administration exerted 48.14%, 49.62%, 65.92%, and 76.77% ulcer inhibition effects at 5, 10, 20, and 40 mg/kg, respectively. Aprepitant administration decreased oxidative stress and inflammatory parameters in stomach tissues dose dependently. Aprepitant administration increased stomach COX-2 mRNA levels at 20 and 40 mg/kg doses. Although aprepitant appears to be disadvantageous in terms of treating gastric ulcer due to COX enzyme inhibition according to the previous studies, aprepitant has been shown to have ulcer healing effect in our study. When aprepitant is given as an anti-nausea and vomiting drug to cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy, we can argue that it will not be necessary to add a new gastric protective agent as it also shows beneficial effects in gastrointestinal complaints.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntiemeticsAprepitantGastric MucosaInflammation MediatorsMaleNauseaRatsRats, WistarStomach UlcerVomitingAntiemeticsAprepitantInflammation MediatorsAprepitantCancerGastrointestinal complaintsRat

Identifiers

PMID32743741
OpenAlexW3046390339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.