Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32743721›Full record

ArticleBrain imaging and behavior2021

Disrupted pathways from frontal-parietal cortex to basal ganglia and cerebellum in patients with unmedicated obsessive compulsive disorder as observed by whole-brain resting-state effective connectivity analysis - a small sample pilot study.

Wei Liu, Minghui Hua, Jun Qin, Qiuju Tang, Yunyi Han, Hongjun Tian, Daxiang Lian, Zhengqing Zhang, Wenqiang Wang, Chunxiang Wang and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Brain imaging and behavior, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Wei LiuDepartment of Psychiatry, Harbin Medical University Affiliated First Hospital, Harbin, 150036, China.
Minghui HuaSchool of Medical Imaging and Tianjin Key Laboratory of Functional Imaging, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, 300074, China.
Jun QinDepartment of Psychiatry, Harbin Medical University Affiliated First Hospital, Harbin, 150036, China.
Qiuju TangDepartment of Psychiatry, Harbin Medical University Affiliated First Hospital, Harbin, 150036, China.
Yunyi HanDepartment of Psychiatry, Harbin Medical University Affiliated First Hospital, Harbin, 150036, China.
Hongjun TianPsychiatric-Neuroimaging-Genetics-Comorbidity Laboratory (PNGC-Lab), Tianjin Mental Health Centre, Tianjin Anding Hospital China, Tianjin, 300222, China.
Daxiang LianPsychiatric-Neuroimaging-Genetics-Comorbidity Laboratory (PNGC-Lab), Tianjin Mental Health Centre, Tianjin Anding Hospital China, Tianjin, 300222, China.
Zhengqing ZhangCo-collaboration Laboratory of China and Canada, Xiamen Xianyue Hospital and University of Alberta, Xiamen, 361000, China.
Wenqiang WangCo-collaboration Laboratory of China and Canada, Xiamen Xianyue Hospital and University of Alberta, Xiamen, 361000, China.
Chunxiang WangDepartment of Medical Imaging Center, Tjianjin Children Hospital, Tianjin, 300305, China.
Ce ChenPsychiatric-Neuroimaging-Genetics Laboratory (PNG-Lab), Wenzhou Seventh people's Hospital, Wenzhou, 325000, Zhejiang Province, China.
Deguo JiangPsychiatric-Neuroimaging-Genetics Laboratory (PNG-Lab), Wenzhou Seventh people's Hospital, Wenzhou, 325000, Zhejiang Province, China.
Gongying LiSchool of Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry, Jining Medical University, Jining, 272119, Shandong Province, China.
Xiaodong LinPsychiatric-Neuroimaging-Genetics Laboratory (PNG-Lab), Wenzhou Seventh people's Hospital, Wenzhou, 325000, Zhejiang Province, China.
Chuanjun ZhuoSchool of Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry, Collaboration of Psychiatric Neuro-Imaging Center, Jining Medical University, Jining, 272191, Shandong Province, China. chuanjunzhuotjmh@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3793-550X

Funding

Harbin Medical University Project to W.L., the National Natural Science Foundation of China 81871052, 81801679Heilongjiang Science and Technology Project H2015063the key project of Wenzhou Science and Technology Bureau ZS2017011the Key Projects of the Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin, China 17JCZDJC35700the Tianjin Health Bureau Foundation 2014KR02Zhejiang Public Welfare Fund Project LGF18H090002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo date, a systematic characterization of abnormalities in resting-state effective connectivity (rsEC) in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is lacking. The present study aimed to systematically characterize whole-brain rsEC in OCD patients as compared to healthy controls.

methodsUsing resting-state fMRI data of 50 unmedicated patients with OCD and 50 healthy participants, we constructed whole-brain rsEC networks using Granger causality analysis followed by univariate and multivariate comparisons between patients and controls. Similar analyses were performed for resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) networks to examine how rsFC and rsEC differentially capture abnormal brain connectivity in OCD.

resultsUnivariate comparisons identified 10 rsEC networks that were significantly disrupted in patients, and which were mainly associated with frontal-parietal cortex, basal ganglia, and cerebellum. Conversely, abnormal rsFC networks were widely distributed throughout the whole brain. Multivariate pattern analysis revealed a classification accuracy as high as 80.5% for distinguishing patients from controls using combined whole-brain rsEC and rsFC.

conclusionsThe results of the present study suggest disrupted communication of information from frontal-parietal cortex to basal ganglia and cerebellum in OCD patients. Using combined whole-brain rsEC and rsFC, multivariate pattern analysis revealed a classification accuracy as high as 80.5% for distinguishing patients from controls. The alterations observed in OCD patients could aid in identifying treatment mechanisms for OCD.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingObsessive-Compulsive DisorderBasal GangliaBrainBrain MappingCerebellumHumansNeural PathwaysParietal LobePilot ProjectsFunctional disruptionsMicrocircuitsObsessive compulsive disorderUnmedicated

Identifiers

PMID32743721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.