Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32743674›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2021

Evaluation of mandibular changes after rapid maxillary expansion: a CBCT study in youngsters with unilateral posterior crossbite using a surface-to-surface matching technique.

Rosalia Maria Leonardi, Khaled Aboulazm, Antonino Lo Giudice, Vincenzo Ronsivalle, Vincenzo D'Antò, Manuel Lagravère, Gaetano Isola

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Use of CBCT in Orthodontics: A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Polymorphisms ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Rosalia Maria LeonardiDepartment of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Policlinico Universitario "Vittorio Emanuele", University of Catania, Catania, Italy. rleonard@unict.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9433-9528
Khaled AboulazmDepartment of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Pharos University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Antonino Lo GiudiceDepartment of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Policlinico Universitario "Vittorio Emanuele", University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Vincenzo RonsivalleDepartment of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Policlinico Universitario "Vittorio Emanuele", University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Vincenzo D'AntòDepartment of Neuroscience, Reproductive Science and Dentistry, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Manuel LagravèreDepartment of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Gaetano IsolaDepartment of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Policlinico Universitario "Vittorio Emanuele", University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
University of Catania · ITPharos University in Alexandria · EGUniversity of Alberta · CAUniversity of Naples Federico II · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe purpose of this study was to evaluate mandibular asymmetry in youngsters with posterior unilateral crossbite (PUXB), through cone-beam computed tomography and reverse engineering technique, before and after rapid maxillary expansion (RME) treatment. MATERIALS AND

methodsForty cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were obtained from all patients at two time points, namely T0 acquired before the placement of a Hyrax expander and T1 after appliance removal. The CBCT scans were segmented and volume rendered into a surface there-dimensional (3D) mesh model. Thereafter, mandibular models were digitally registered by using a "best-fit" algorithm. Surface and volumetric changes, between T0 and T1, were compared by using Student's t tests.

resultsA slight increase of 0.45 cm

conclusionsYoungsters affected by PUXB showed a very slight and not statistically significant volumetric and morphological asymmetry between CB side and non-CB side at T0. However, the change in mean differences of 0.26 cm cannot be considered clinically relevant. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Mandibles in young PUXB patients exhibit only a very mild mandibular asymmetry. Although the statistically significant mean change found right after RME removal cannot be considered clinically relevant, a more consistent sample and a longer follow-up could be of interest in explaining the short-term findings.

Indexed as

MalocclusionSpiral Cone-Beam Computed TomographyCone-Beam Computed TomographyHumansMandibleMaxillaPalatal Expansion TechniqueCBCTCrossbiteFacial asymmetryOrthodonticsRME

Identifiers

PMID32743674
OpenAlexW3046395395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.