Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32743552›Full record

ArticleNAR cancer2020

Distinct roles of structure-specific endonucleases EEPD1 and Metnase in replication stress responses.

Neelam Sharma, Michael C Speed, Christopher P Allen, David G Maranon, Elizabeth Williamson, Sudha Singh, Robert Hromas, Jac A Nickoloff

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NAR cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Cellular Responses to Widespread DNA Replication Stress.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Neelam SharmaDepartment of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, 1618 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1618, USA.
Michael C SpeedDepartment of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, 1618 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1618, USA.
Christopher P AllenDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology, and Pathology, Colorado State University, 1601Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1601, USA.
David G MaranonDepartment of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, 1618 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1618, USA.
Elizabeth WilliamsonDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Texas HealthScience Center, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA.
Sudha SinghDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Texas HealthScience Center, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA.
Robert HromasDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Texas HealthScience Center, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA.
Jac A NickoloffDepartment of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, 1618 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1618, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8606-7545
Colorado State University · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · US

Funding

EEPD1 Repair of Stressed Replication ForksR01CA205224 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI Robert A Hromas · 2016 to 2026
$3.3M
METNASE ROLES IN NHEJ, DNA INTEGRATION AND TRANSLOCATIONR01GM084020 · NIGMS · COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI NICKOLOFF, JAC A · 2009 to 2016
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA205224NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM084020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate DNA replication and segregation are critical for maintaining genome integrity and suppressing cancer. Metnase and EEPD1 are DNA damage response (DDR) proteins frequently dysregulated in cancer and implicated in cancer etiology and tumor response to genotoxic chemo- and radiotherapy. Here, we examine the DDR in human cell lines with CRISPR/Cas9 knockout of Metnase or EEPD1. The knockout cell lines exhibit slightly slower growth rates, significant hypersensitivity to replication stress, increased genome instability and distinct alterations in DDR signaling. Metnase and EEPD1 are structure-specific nucleases. EEPD1 is recruited to and cleaves stalled forks to initiate fork restart by homologous recombination. Here, we demonstrate that Metnase is also recruited to stalled forks where it appears to dimethylate histone H3 lysine 36 (H3K36me2), raising the possibility that H3K36me2 promotes DDR factor recruitment or limits nucleosome eviction to protect forks from nucleolytic attack. We show that stalled forks are cleaved normally in the absence of Metnase, an important and novel result because a prior study indicated that Metnase nuclease is important for timely fork restart. A double knockout was as sensitive to etoposide as either single knockout, suggesting a degree of epistasis between Metnase and EEPD1. We propose that EEPD1 initiates fork restart by cleaving stalled forks, and that Metnase may promote fork restart by processing homologous recombination intermediates and/or inducing H3K36me2 to recruit DDR factors. By accelerating fork restart, Metnase and EEPD1 reduce the chance that stalled replication forks will adopt toxic or genome-destabilizing structures, preventing genome instability and cancer. Metnase and EEPD1 are overexpressed in some cancers and thus may also promote resistance to genotoxic therapeutics.

Identifiers

PMID32743552
PMCPMC7380491
OpenAlexW3034625451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.