Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32743326›Full record

ReviewAnnals of geriatric medicine and research2020

Measuring Frailty in Health Care Databases for Clinical Care and Research.

Dae Hyun Kim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of geriatric medicine and research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Application of Claims-based Frailty Index to a Structured Electronic Health Record Data.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Association of Coprescribing of Gabapentinoid and Other Psychoactive Medications With Altered Mental Status and Falls in Adults Receiving Dialysis.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2025
    Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Frailty in Older Adults.The New England journal of medicine · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Dae Hyun KimHinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7290-6838

Funding

Prospective Monitoring of Newly Approved Cardiovascular Drugs in Older Adults with FrailtyR01AG062713 · NIA · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI KIM, DAE HYUN · 2019 to 2022
$2.8M
Development and Validation of a Frailty Index Using Claims Data for Pharmacoepidemiologic Studies in Older AdultsK08AG051187 · NIA · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI KIM, DAE HYUN · 2015 to 2017
$636k
NIA NIH HHS K08 AG051187NIA NIH HHS R01 AG062713
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Considering the increasing burden and serious consequences of frailty in aging populations, there is increasing interest in measuring frailty in health care databases for clinical care and research. This review synthesizes the latest research on the development and application of 21 frailty measures for health care databases. Frailty measures varied widely in terms of target population (16 ambulatory, 1 long-term care, and 4 inpatient), data source (16 claims-based and 5 electronic health records [EHR]-based measures), assessment period (6 months to 36 months), data types (diagnosis codes required for 17 measures, health service codes for 7 measures, pharmacy data for 4 measures, and other information for 9 measures), and outcomes for validation (clinical frailty for 7 measures, disability for 7 measures, and mortality for 16 measures). These frailty measures may be useful to facilitate frailty screening in clinical care and quantify frailty for large database research in which clinical assessment is not feasible.

Indexed as

Electronic health recordsFrailtyHealthcare administrative claims

Identifiers

PMID32743326
PMCPMC7370795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.