Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32743249›Full record

ReviewAnnals of geriatric medicine and research2018

Home-Based Primary Care for Homebound Older Adults: Literature Review.

Chang-O Kim, Soong-Nang Jang

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of geriatric medicine and research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. CAPABLEJournal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Who Are the People Willing to Pay for Physician Home Visits?Journal of Korean medical science · 2020
    Article
  19. Time to Conduct Community-Oriented Researches in Geriatrics.Annals of geriatric medicine and research · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chang-O KimInstitute of Social Welfare, Sungkonghoe University, Seoul, Korea.
Soong-Nang JangRed Cross College of Nursing, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-2621-945X
Chung-Ang University · KRSungkonghoe University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Home-based primary care (HBPC) refers to the type of home care services which provide interdisciplinary primary care services with a comprehensive and continuous manner. Currently, it is getting much attention due to possess potential of converting primary care services from outpatient clinic to home, especially for those who are medically isolated including homebound older adults. This study examined a number of HBPCs introduced in the literature since 1990s, and summarizes the key factors with the analytic framework of 5Ps: purpose, patients, people, process, patterns. The results of this study emphasize that contents of primary care for older population should be different from those of the general population. This paper may be interpreted as the practice guideline of the following policy questions: "How can we design the HBPC if it is introduced in the nearest future?" In the future, it is necessary to have a heated debate concerning what is the most desirable primary care system for older adults.

Indexed as

FrailtyHomebound older adultsHome careInterdisciplinary teamPrimary care system

Identifiers

PMID32743249
PMCPMC7387609
OpenAlexW2810886435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.