ArticleACS omega2020
Lyotropic Liquid Crystal-Based Membranes for Water Remediation: Fabrication, Characterization and Performance Evaluation.
Article in ACS omega, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In water remediation, biomimetic membranes are gaining much attention due to their selectivity, dynamic stability, nontoxicity, and biocompatibility. Lyotropic liquid crystals (LLCs) are self-organizing networks that can conform to an array of geometries with high pore densities. As such, LLCs are excellent membrane materials for water applications because they are water insoluble and are manipulated to conform to an array of morphologies that provide natural water channels that are readily tunable in size. They have the ability to create uniform pores, between the range of 1 and 5 nm, with large surface areas. Thus, this work focuses on the design, fabrication, and characterization of LLC-modified Janus-type membranes for forward osmosis applications. Physical characterization of the membranes was performed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and the results show an open-pore radius and the presence of both finger- and sponge-like pores depending on membrane preparation. The contact angle assessment indicates that as the membranes are further modified with other polymers (e.g., PAN), higher hydrophilicity and surface energy are achieved. Moreover, the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) analysis showed a significant variation in the pore distribution between membranes. Functionalized membranes presented satisfactory water flux and superior salt rejection compared to nonfunctionalized membranes. SupPACMoDS membranes are 83% more efficient at preventing salt back flux than the nonmodified version. This is credited to the thickness and pore structure provided by the PAN support layer in the membrane.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.