Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32743137›Full record

ReviewCell surface (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2019

Nanomotion detection based on atomic force microscopy cantilevers.

A C Kohler, L Venturelli, G Longo, G Dietler, S Kasas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell surface (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Mechanical reinforcement of graphene via wrinkling.NPJ 2D materials and applications · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Toward a role for the acoustic field in cells interaction.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  7. Rapid Detection ofBiomedicines · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

A C KohlerLaboratoire de Physique de la Matière Vivante, EPFL, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
L VenturelliLaboratoire de Physique de la Matière Vivante, EPFL, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
G LongoIstituto di Struttura della Materia ISM-CNR, Rome, Italy.
G DietlerLaboratoire de Physique de la Matière Vivante, EPFL, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
S KasasLaboratoire de Physique de la Matière Vivante, EPFL, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atomic force microscopes (AFM) or low-noise in-house dedicated devices can highlight nanomotion oscillations. The method consists of attaching the organism of interest onto a silicon-based sensor and following its nano-scale motion as a function of time. The nanometric scale oscillations exerted by biological specimens last as long the organism is viable and reflect the status of the microorganism metabolism upon exposure to different chemical or physical stimuli. During the last couple of years, the nanomotion pattern of several types of bacteria, yeasts and mammalian cells has been determined. This article reviews this technique in details, presents results obtained with dozens of different microorganisms and discusses the potential applications of nanomotion in fundamental research, medical microbiology and space exploration.

Indexed as

AFMAntibiotic Susceptibility Test (AST)Cell viabilityNanomotion detection

Identifiers

PMID32743137
PMCPMC7388971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.