Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32743116›Full record

ArticleJournal of the anus, rectum and colon2020

E-PASS Scoring System May Be Useful for Prediction of Postoperative Complications in Super Elderly Colorectal Cancer Surgery Patients.

Hiroka Kondo, Yasumitsu Hirano, Toshimasa Ishii, Kiyoka Hara, Nao Obara, Liming Wang, Masahiro Asari, Takuya Kato, Shigeki Yamaguchi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the anus, rectum and colon, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hiroka KondoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Japan.
Yasumitsu HiranoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Japan.
Toshimasa IshiiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Japan.
Kiyoka HaraDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Japan.
Nao ObaraDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Japan.
Liming WangDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Japan.
Masahiro AsariDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Japan.
Takuya KatoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Japan.
Shigeki YamaguchiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Japan.
Saitama Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesJapan is facing an aging society. Elderly individuals are generally more prone to comorbidities and have weaker immune defenses, with ominous prognostic implications if postoperative complications arise. The aim of this study was to explore scoring systems for predicting postoperative morbidity risk in super elderly patients (≥85 years old) after colorectal surgery for cancer.

methodsA population of elderly patients (n = 145) surgically treated for primary colorectal cancer within our department between April 2007 and December 2018 was examined retrospectively, assessing the capacities of various indices, such as Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS), neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), prognostic nutritional index (PNI), and modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS), to predict postoperative complications.

resultsNLR, PLR, and mGPS did not differ significantly in the presence or absence of complications, whereas PNI tended to be lower if complications developed. The E-PASS system showed no group-wise differences in preoperative risk score (PRS), but the surgical stress score (SSS) and the comprehensive risk score (CRS; a composite of PRS and SSS) was significantly higher in patients with complications. Based on the cutoff value calculated from the Receiver operating curve (ROC) for the E-PASS CRS (-0.0580), patients were stratified into low-scoring and high-scoring (HSG) groups. Although not significantly different, the overall survival in the HSG tended to be lower by comparison.

conclusionsThe E-PASS scoring system may be a useful predictor of postoperative complications in super elderly patients requiring colorectal cancer surgery.

Indexed as

colorectal cancerelderlypostoperative complicationsprognostic scoring

Identifiers

PMID32743116
PMCPMC7390610
OpenAlexW3046077928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.