ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2020
Features and clinical impact of extra-cardiac lesions with
Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic yield of whole-bodyJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023Article
- Value of 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) in the differential diagnosis of sarcoidosis and lung cancer with lymph node metastasis: a retrospective study.Translational lung cancer research · 2022Article
- The Role of Multimodality Imaging in Cardiac Sarcoidosis.Korean circulation journal · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSarcoidosis is a systemic inflammatory disorder and can often affect any other organs beyond the heart. Whole-body METHODS AND
resultsWe enrolled 120 consecutive patients with abnormal findings clinically suggesting cardiac sarcoidosis who underwent whole-body FDG-PET. In this study, a patient with suspected cardiac sarcoidosis was defined as one having both clinically suspected findings and FDG-PET positive cardiac uptake. Subsequently, a total of 36 patients with suspected cardiac sarcoidosis were found and analyzed. Extra-cardiac involvement was detected in 35 lesions of 14 patients (39% per patient). In particular, the extra-cardiac lesions were widely distributed throughout the body, and mediastinal/hilar lymph node involvement was most commonly observed. In most of the patients (93% per patient, 13/14), the extra-cardiac lesions were localized in the regions that were considered more accessible with less risk of complication compared with endomyocardial biopsy (EMB). Based on the FDG-PET findings, 8 patients underwent extra-cardiac biopsy without complication, and its diagnostic sensitivity for histological sarcoidosis was high (75%, 6/8). Moreover, FDG-PET-guided extra-cardiac biopsy could confirm histological sarcoidosis in 4 lesions that EMB failed to prove.
conclusionsExtra-cardiac involvement in patients with suspected cardiac sarcoidosis was relatively high. FDG-PET-guided extra-cardiac biopsy may be safe and useful for the imaging based diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.