Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32742930›Full record

ArticleAsian journal of urology2020

Efficacy and safety of degarelix in patients with prostate cancer: Results from a phase III study in China.

Yinghao Sun, Liping Xie, Tao Xu, Jørn S Jakobsen, Weiqing Han, Per S Sørensen, Xiaofeng Wang

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian journal of urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A systematic review and meta-analysis of cardiovascular disease risk with degarelix and GnRH agonists in prostate cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Degarelix for treating advanced hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Cambridge Neoadjuvant Cancer of the Prostate (CANCAP03): A Window Study into the Effects of Olaparib ± Degarelix in Primary Prostate Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Editorial Comment to Considerations for the use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists and antagonists in patients with prostate cancer.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Yinghao SunDepartment of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Liping XieDepartment of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Tao XuDepartment of Urology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jørn S JakobsenGlobal Clinical Research and Development, Ferring Pharmaceuticals A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Weiqing HanDepartment of Urology, Hunan Cancer Hospital, Hunan Province, China.
Per S SørensenGlobal Clinical Research and Development, Ferring Pharmaceuticals A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Xiaofeng WangDepartment of Urology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Ferring Pharmaceuticals (Denmark) · DKPeking University People's Hospital · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University · CNHunan Cancer Hospital · CNSecond Military Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo establish non-inferiority of gonadotropin-releasing hormone degarelix compared with goserelin in suppressing and maintaining castrate testosterone levels from Day 28 to Day 364 in Chinese patients with prostate cancer.

methodsThis is an open-label, multi-centre study in which men aged ≥18 years were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to once-a-month subcutaneous injection of either degarelix (240/80 mg) or goserelin (3.6 mg) for 12 months. The primary endpoint was difference in 1-year cumulative probability of suppressing testosterone to ≤0.5 ng/mL. Non-inferiority was to be established if the lower 95% confidence interval (CI) limit for difference in cumulative probability between the treatment arms was greater than -10%. Secondary endpoints included cumulative probability of prostate-specific-antigen-progression-free-survival (PSA-PFS). Safety was also assessed.

resultsBaseline demographics and disease characteristics were similar between degarelix (

conclusionDegarelix was non-inferior to goserelin in achieving and maintaining testosterone suppression at castrate levels during 1-year treatment. PSA-PFS was significantly higher with degarelix, suggesting improved disease control. Both treatments were well tolerated.

Indexed as

ChinaDegarelixGnRH agonistGnRH antagonistGoserelinProstate cancer

Identifiers

PMID32742930
PMCPMC7385516
OpenAlexW2976578307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.