Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32742718›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2020

The value of real-world testing: a qualitative feasibility study to explore staff and organisational barriers and strategies to support implementation of a clinical pathway for the management of anxiety and depression in adult cancer patients.

Liesbeth Geerligs, Heather L Shepherd, Nicole M Rankin, Lindy Masya, Joanne M Shaw, Melanie A Price, Haryana Dhillon, Colette Dolan, Gabrielle Prest, ADAPT Program Group and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Liesbeth GeerligsPsycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7217-6502
Heather L ShepherdPsycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia.
Nicole M RankinFaculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia.
Lindy MasyaPsycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia.
Joanne M ShawPsycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia.
Melanie A PricePsycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia.
Haryana DhillonPsycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia.
Colette DolanThe Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Sydney, NSW Australia.
Gabrielle PrestThe Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Sydney, NSW Australia.
ADAPT Program Group
Phyllis ButowPsycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia.
The University of Sydney · AUThe Kinghorn Cancer Centre · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective translation of evidence-based research into clinical practice requires assessment of the many factors that can impact implementation success. Research methods that draw on recognised implementation frameworks, such as the Promoting Action Research in Health Services (PARiHS) framework, and that test feasibility to gain information prior to full-scale roll-out, can support a more structured approach to implementation.

objectiveThis paper presents qualitative findings from a feasibility study in one cancer service of an online portal to operationalise a clinical pathway for the screening, assessment and management of anxiety and depression in adult cancer patients. The aim of this study was to explore staff perspectives on the feasibility and acceptance of a range of strategies to support implementation in order to inform the full-scale roll-out.

methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with fifteen hospital staff holding a range of clinical, administrative and managerial roles, and with differing levels of exposure to the pathway. Qualitative data were analysed thematically, and themes were subsequently organised within the constructs of the PARiHS framework.

resultsBarriers and facilitators that affected the feasibility of the online portal and implementation strategies were organised across eight key themes: staff perceptions, culture, external influences, attitudes to psychosocial care, intervention fit, familiarity, burden and engagement. These themes mapped to the PARiHS framework's three domains of evidence, context and facilitation.

conclusionsImplementation success may be threatened by a range of factors related to the real-world context, perceptions of the intervention (evidence) and the process by which it is introduced (facilitation). Feasibility testing of implementation strategies can provide unique insights into issues likely to influence full-scale implementation, allowing for early tailoring and more effective facilitation which may save time, money and effort in the long-term. Use of a determinant implementation framework can assist researchers to synthesise and effectively respond to barriers as they arise. While the current feasibility study related to a specific implementation, strategies such as regular engagement with local stakeholders, and discussion of barriers arising in real-time during early testing is likely to be of benefit to all researchers and clinicians seeking to maximise the likelihood of long-term implementation success.

Indexed as

Barrier analysisClinical pathwayFeasibility studyHealth services researchImplementation sciencePsycho-oncologyQualitative analysis

Identifiers

PMID32742718
PMCPMC7388211
OpenAlexW3045728102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.