Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32742642›Full record

Trial reportJournal of nutritional science2020

A period of 10 weeks of increased protein consumption does not alter faecal microbiota or volatile metabolites in healthy older men: a randomised controlled trial.

S M Mitchell, E J McKenzie, C J Mitchell, A M Milan, N Zeng, R F D'Souza, F Ramzan, P Sharma, E Rettedal, S O Knowles and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of nutritional science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Plant and Animal Protein Sources in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Current Evidence and Clinical Implications.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. The gut microbiome as a modulator of healthy ageing.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

S M MitchellLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
E J McKenzieDepartment of Physiology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
C J MitchellLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
A M MilanLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-9559-7326
N ZengLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
R F D'SouzaLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
F RamzanLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
P SharmaLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-8213-8585
E RettedalFood Nutrition & Health Team, AgResearch, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
S O KnowlesFood Nutrition & Health Team, AgResearch, Palmerston North, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-3482-5513
N C RoyLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
A SjödinDepartment of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark.
K-H WagnerDepartment of Nutritional Sciences and Research Platform Active Ageing, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
J M O'SullivanLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-2927-450X
D Cameron-SmithLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
University of Auckland · NZAgResearch · NZAgency for Science, Technology and Research · SGUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diet has a major influence on the composition and metabolic output of the gut microbiome. Higher-protein diets are often recommended for older consumers; however, the effect of high-protein diets on the gut microbiota and faecal volatile organic compounds (VOC) of elderly participants is unknown. The purpose of the study was to establish if the faecal microbiota composition and VOC in older men are different after a diet containing the recommended dietary intake (RDA) of protein compared with a diet containing twice the RDA (2RDA). Healthy males (74⋅2 (sd 3⋅6) years;

Indexed as

Dietary ProteinsDiet, High-ProteinAgedFecesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansMaleMicrobiotaNutritional RequirementsTreatment OutcomeVolatile Organic CompoundsDietary ProteinsVolatile Organic Compounds16S amplicon sequencing16S rRNA, 16S ribosomal RNA2RDA, diet containing twice the RDA of proteinAMDIS, Automated Mass Spectral Deconvolution and Identification SystemBCFA, branched-chain fatty acidFermentationHS/SPME/GCMS, head space/solid-phase microextraction/GC-MSMaAsLin, Multivariate Association with Linear ModelMicrobiomeRDA, diet containing the RDA of proteinRecommended dietary intakeVOC, volatile organic compoundVolatile organic compounds

Identifiers

PMID32742642
PMCPMC7372166
OpenAlexW3039504090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.