ReviewWorld journal of radiology2020
Multi-modality imaging of cardiac amyloidosis: Contemporary update.
Review in World journal of radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Potential Approach to Bridge the Diagnostic Gap and Propose a Referral Pathway for Suspected ATTR-CA Based on Incidental Cardiac Uptake inDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Advances and challenges in echocardiographic diagnosis and management of cardiac amyloidosis.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2025Review
- Inherited transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis presenting with diastolic heart failure and gastrointestinal symptoms: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Cardiac amyloidosis: A diagnostic challenge.Radiology case reports · 2024Article
- Molecular Design of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Agents Binding to Amyloid Deposits.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Cardiac amyloidosis: evolving pathogenesis, multimodal diagnostics, and principles of treatment.EXCLI journal · 2023Review
- Nuclear Imaging for the Diagnosis of Cardiac Amyloidosis in 2021.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiac amyloidosis is a heterogeneous and challenging diagnostic disease with poor prognosis that is now being altered by introduction of new therapies. Echocardiography remains the first-line imaging tool, and when disease is suspected on echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and nuclear imaging play critical roles in the non-invasive diagnosis and evaluation of cardiac amyloidosis. Advances in multi-modality cardiac imaging allowing earlier diagnosis and initiation of novel therapies have significantly improved the outcomes in these patients. Cardiac imaging also plays important roles in the risk stratification of patients presenting with cardiac amyloidosis. In the current review, we provide a clinical and imaging focused update, and importantly outline the imaging protocols, diagnostic and prognostic utility of multimodality cardiac imaging in the assessment of cardiac amyloidosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.