Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32742547›Full record

ArticleJournal of microbiology & biology education2020

Benefits of a College STEM Faculty Development Initiative: Instructors Report Increased and Sustained Implementation of Research-Based Instructional Strategies.

Mary F Durham, Oriana R Aragón, Meghan E Bathgate, Aiyana Bobrownicki, Andrew J Cavanagh, Xinnian Chen, William M Trochim, Jonathan K Waterhouse, Mark J Graham, Brian A Couch

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of microbiology & biology education, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Mary F DurhamSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68588.
Oriana R AragónMarketing Department, College of Business, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634.
Meghan E BathgatePoorvu Center for Teaching and Learning, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511.
Aiyana BobrownickiPoorvu Center for Teaching and Learning, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511.
Andrew J CavanaghPoorvu Center for Teaching and Learning, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511.
Xinnian ChenDepartment of Physiology and Neurobiology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269.
William M TrochimDepartment of Policy Analysis and Management and Cornell Office for Research on Evaluation, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850.
Jonathan K WaterhousePoorvu Center for Teaching and Learning, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511.
Mark J GrahamSTEM Program Evaluation and Research Lab, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511.
Brian A CouchSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68588.
Yale University · USUniversity of Nebraska–Lincoln · USClemson University · USPolicy Analysis (United States) · USUniversity of Connecticut · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Summer Institutes on Scientific Teaching (SI) is a faculty development workshop in which science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) instructors, particularly from biology, are trained in the Scientific Teaching (ST) pedagogy. While participants have generally reported positive experiences, we aimed to assess how the SI affected participants' teaching practices. Building on a previously developed taxonomy of ST practices, we surveyed SI participants from the 2004-2014 SI classes regarding specific ST practices. Participants' self-reported use and implementation of ST practices increased immediately after SI attendance as well as over a longer time frame, suggesting that implementation persisted and even increased with time. However, instructors reported implementation gains for some practices more than others. The practices with the highest gains were engaging students in their own learning, using learning goals in course design, employing formative assessment, developing overarching course learning goals, representing science as a process, and facilitating group discussion activities. We propose that the ST practices showing the greatest gains may serve as beneficial focal points for professional development programs, while practices with smaller gains may require modified dissemination approaches or support structures.

Identifiers

PMID32742547
PMCPMC7386324
OpenAlexW3046759793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.