ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2020
Differential Atrophy in the Hippocampal Subfield Volumes in Four Types of Mild Dementia.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Cortical and Subcortical Volumetric Changes in Alzheimer's Disease: Association with Clinical Severity.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Seven tesla MRI reveals amygdala and hippocampal subfield atrophy in dementia with Lewy bodies.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2026Article
- Investigating Alzheimer's Disease Progression Using a Radiomics Approach: The Hippocampal-Amygdala Border in FDG-Positron Emission Tomography Scans.Neuro-degenerative diseases · 2026Article
- Semantic Memory, Traumatic Brain Injury, and the Iceberg Effect: What Deficits May Lie Below the Surface?American journal of speech-language pathology · 2025Review
- Voxel- and surface-based morphometry in the cortical thickness and cortical and subcortical gray matter volume in patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025Article
- Differential Vulnerability of Hippocampal Subfields to Amyloid and Tau Deposition in the Lewy Body Diseases.Neurology · 2024Observational
- Volumetric analysis of hippocampal subregions and subfields in left and right semantic dementia.Brain communications · 2024Article
- Consensus on rapid screening for prodromal Alzheimer's disease in China.General psychiatry · 2024Review
- Reply to Letter to Editor.Experimental brain research · 2023Article
- The role of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis and prognosis of dementia.Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2023Review
- Atrophy asymmetry in hippocampal subfields in patients with Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment.Experimental brain research · 2023Article
- Piecing it together: atrophy profiles of hippocampal subfields relate to cognitive impairment along the Alzheimer's disease spectrum.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2023Article
- Atrophy of hippocampal subfields relates to memory decline during the pathological progression of Alzheimer's disease.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2023Article
- Neurodegeneration and Astrogliosis in the Human CA1 Hippocampal Subfield Are Related to hsp90ab1 and bag3 in Alzheimer's Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Emotion Processing Dysfunction in Alzheimer's Disease: An Overview of Behavioral Findings, Systems Neural Correlates, and Underlying Neural Biology.American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementiasReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo investigate the bilateral hippocampal subfield volumetric differences in four types of mild dementia, namely typical Alzheimer's disease (tAD), dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), semantic dementia (SD), and posterior cortical atrophy (PCA), to assist differential diagnosis.
methodsOne hundred three participants, including 22 tAD, 34 SD (17 left SD and 17 right SD), 15 DLB, 12 PCA patients, and 20 normal controls (NC), were recruited. All subjects received standard neuropsychological assessments and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The hippocampal subfields were automatically segmented via Freesurfer. The study compared the volumetric differences and used the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to estimate the efficacy of each hippocampal subfield to distinguish between groups. Spearman correlation analysis was used to investigate the relationship between memory recall scores and hippocampal subfield volumes.
resultsThe hippocampal subfield atrophy varied in different groups: tAD, SD, and PCA patients had subregional atrophy in bilateral hippocampi compared to NC, and DLB patients showed preserved volumes; left SD patients suffered the most severe atrophy of the left hippocampus, and right SD patients were atrophied mostly in the right hippocampus. There was no significant difference in the volume of hippocampal subregions between tAD and PCA subjects, but the former tended to be atrophied more asymmetrically. ROC analysis showed that, for discrimination, the areas under the curve (AUC) of some subfields were larger than the total hippocampus, but none observed significant difference. In addition, immediate recall scores were correlated to left CA1, CA2/3, CA4/DG, subiculum, and presubiculum (
conclusionDifferential atrophy patterns in the bilateral hippocampal subfield volumes could serve the differential diagnosis in patients with different causes of mild dementia: left CA1 for tAD; left presubiculum for LSD; right CA4/DG, right presubiculum, and right subiculum for RSD; CA4/DG and right CA2/3 for DLB; right CA2/3 and right CA4/DG for PCA. Additionally, several hippocampal subfield volumes were significantly associated with memory scores, further highlighting the essential role of the hippocampus in memory decline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.