ReviewClinical proteomics2020
Proteomic approaches for characterizing renal cell carcinoma.
Review in Clinical proteomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Liquid-based kidney injury molecule-1 as a diagnostic and prognostic indicator in renal cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.International urology and nephrology · 2025Pooled it
- From Genes to Proteins: The Indispensable Role of Proteogenomics in Advancing Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- High-Sensitive Spatial Proteomics for Pancreatic Cancer Progression Analysis.Analytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Exploring the role of key gene PTTG1 in clear cell renal carcinoma based on bioinformatics analysis and In-vitro cell experiments.Toxicology research · 2025Article
- Proteomics Characterization of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarkers in Renal Clear Cell Carcinoma.Biomedicines · 2022Review
- Precision Medicine: An Optimal Approach to Patient Care in Renal Cell Carcinoma.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Review
- Advancing the diagnosis and classification of renal cell carcinomas.BMC medicine · 2021Article
- Liquid Biopsies in Renal Cell Carcinoma-Recent Advances and Promising New Technologies for the Early Detection of Metastatic Disease.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Review
- Using Comparative Proteomics to Identify Protein Signatures in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.Cancer genomics & proteomicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Renal cell carcinoma is among the top 15 most commonly diagnosed cancers worldwide, comprising multiple sub-histologies with distinct genomic, proteomic, and clinicopathological features. Proteomic methodologies enable the detection and quantitation of protein profiles associated with the disease state and have been explored to delineate the dysregulated cellular processes associated with renal cell carcinoma. In this review we highlight the reports that employed proteomic technologies to characterize tissue, blood, and urine samples obtained from renal cell carcinoma patients. We describe the proteomic approaches utilized and relate the results of studies in the larger context of renal cell carcinoma biology. Moreover, we discuss some unmet clinical needs and how emerging proteomic approaches can seek to address them. There has been significant progress to characterize the molecular features of renal cell carcinoma; however, despite the large-scale studies that have characterized the genomic and transcriptomic profiles, curative treatments are still elusive. Proteomics facilitates a direct evaluation of the functional modules that drive pathobiology, and the resulting protein profiles would have applications in diagnostics, patient stratification, and identification of novel therapeutic interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.