ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences
Does
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Protective effects of Origanum vulgare L. leaf aqueous extract on spermatogenesis in testopathy induced by cisplatin chemotherapy: An experimental study.Clinical and experimental reproductive medicine · 2026Article
- The mitigating effects of Tribulus terrestris extract on the cytotoxic, genotoxic, biochemical and phytotoxic effects of omethoate in roots of Allium cepa bulbs.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Sex and adrenal hormones in association with insecticide biomarkers among adolescents living in ecuadorian agricultural communities.International journal of hygiene and environmental health · 2024Article
- Puncture vine (Tribulus Terrestris L.) in control of health and reproduction.Physiological research · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMATERIALS AND
methodsIn this experimental study, 48 male Wistar rats were randomly assigned to eight groups: first group, sham group (normal saline); second group, Malathion (250 mg/kg) group; third to fifth groups,
resultsAll the values of male reproductive parameters reduced significantly in the Malathion group as compared to the sham group (
conclusion
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.